Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30233361›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2018

A History of Drug Discovery for Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting and the Implications for Future Research.

Gareth J Sanger, Paul L R Andrews

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The gut feeling in motion sickness.Communications biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Sensory signals for nausea.Trends in neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Central mechanisms of emesis: A role for GDF15.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Common Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Treatment of Diabetic Gastroparesis.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024
    Review
  17. The antiemetic actions of GIP receptor agonism.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gareth J SangerBlizard Institute and the National Centre for Bowel Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul L R AndrewsDivision of Biomedical Sciences, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Queen Mary University of London · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origins of the major classes of current anti-emetics are examined. Serendipity is a recurrent theme in discovery of their anti-emetic properties and repurposing from one indication to another is a continuing trend. Notably, the discoveries have occurred against a background of company mergers and changing anti-emetic requirements. Major drug classes include: (i)

Indexed as

5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonistsdrug discoveryhistamine H1 receptor antagonistsmetoclopramidemuscarinic receptor antagonistsnausea and vomitingneurokinin1 receptor antagonistsolanzapine

Identifiers

PMID30233361
PMCPMC6131675
OpenAlexW2889719465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.