Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30233290›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Alastair I Grainger, Marianne C King, David A Nagel, H Rheinallt Parri, Michael D Coleman, Eric J Hill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The neurovasculature as a target in temporal lobe epilepsy.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alastair I GraingerLife and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Marianne C KingLife and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
David A NagelLife and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
H Rheinallt ParriLife and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Michael D ColemanLife and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Eric J HillLife and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain is the most complex organ in the body, controlling our highest functions, as well as regulating myriad processes which incorporate the entire physiological system. The effects of prospective therapeutic entities on the brain and central nervous system (CNS) may potentially cause significant injury, hence, CNS toxicity testing forms part of the "core battery" of safety pharmacology studies. Drug-induced seizure is a major reason for compound attrition during drug development. Currently, the rat

Indexed as

astrocytesin vitroiPSC neuronssafety pharmacologyseizures

Identifiers

PMID30233290
PMCPMC6127295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.