Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30233289›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Mobile Mechatronic/Robotic Orthotic Devices to Assist-Rehabilitate Neuromotor Impairments in the Upper Limb: A Systematic and Synthetic Review.

Gelu Onose, Nirvana Popescu, Constantin Munteanu, Vlad Ciobanu, Corina Sporea, Marian-Daniel Mirea, Cristina Daia, Ioana Andone, Aura Spînu, Andrada Mirea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Robotics in Physical Rehabilitation: Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Fuzzy Logic-Based Risk Assessment of a Parallel Robot for Elbow and Wrist Rehabilitation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gelu OnoseDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Nirvana PopescuComputer Science Department, Politehnica University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Constantin MunteanuEmergency Clinical Hospital Bagdasar Arseni, Bucharest, Romania.
Vlad CiobanuComputer Science Department, Politehnica University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Corina SporeaNational Teaching Center for Neuro-Psyhomotor Rehabilitation in Children N. Robanescu, Bucharest, Romania.
Marian-Daniel MireaNational Teaching Center for Neuro-Psyhomotor Rehabilitation in Children N. Robanescu, Bucharest, Romania.
Cristina DaiaDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Ioana AndoneEmergency Clinical Hospital Bagdasar Arseni, Bucharest, Romania.
Aura SpînuEmergency Clinical Hospital Bagdasar Arseni, Bucharest, Romania.
Andrada MireaDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · ROUniversitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București · ROCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper overviews the state-of-the-art in upper limb robot-supported approaches, focusing on advancements in the related mechatronic devices for the patients' rehabilitation and/or assistance. Dedicated to the technical, comprehensively methodological and global effectiveness and improvement in this inter-disciplinary field of research, it includes information beyond the therapy administrated in clinical settings-but with no diminished safety requirements. Our systematic review, based on PRISMA guidelines, searched articles published between January 2001 and November 2017 from the following databases: Cochrane, Medline/PubMed, PMC, Elsevier, PEDro, and ISI Web of Knowledge/Science. Then we have applied a new innovative PEDro-inspired technique to classify the relevant articles. The article focuses on the main indications, current technologies, categories of intervention and outcome assessment modalities. It includes also, in tabular form, the main characteristics of the most relevant mobile (wearable and/or portable) mechatronic/robotic orthoses/exoskeletons prototype devices used to assist-rehabilitate neuromotor impairments in the upper limb.

Indexed as

mechatronic wearable orthosesmobile robotic orthotic devicesrobotic exoskeletonssystematic and synthetic reviewupper limb rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID30233289
PMCPMC6134072
OpenAlexW2891324327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.