Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30233258›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

VEMP using a new low-frequency bone conduction transducer.

Bo Håkansson, Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson, Tomas Tengstrand, Leif Johannsen, Måns Eeg-Olofsson, Cristina Rigato, Elisabeth Dahlström, Sabine Reinfeldt

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Bone Conduction Stimulated VEMP Using the B250 Transducer.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bo HåkanssonDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, boh@chalmers.se.
Karl-Johan Fredén JanssonDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, boh@chalmers.se.
Tomas TengstrandDepartment of Audiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Leif JohannsenOrtofon A/S, Nakskov, Denmark.
Måns Eeg-OlofssonDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Cristina RigatoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, boh@chalmers.se.
Elisabeth DahlströmDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sabine ReinfeldtDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, boh@chalmers.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA new prototype bone conduction (BC) transducer B250, with an emphasized low-frequency response, is evaluated in vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) investigations. The aim was to compare cervical (cVEMP) and ocular (oVEMP) responses using tone bursts at 250 and 500 Hz with BC stimulation using the B250 and the conventional B81 transducer and by using air conduction (AC) stimulation.

methodsThree normal subjects were investigated in a pilot study. BC stimulation was applied to the mastoids in cVEMP, and both mastoid and forehead in oVEMP investigations.

resultsBC stimulation was found to reach VEMP thresholds at considerably lower hearing levels than in AC stimulation (30-40 dB lower oVEMP threshold at 250 Hz). Three or more cVEMP and oVEMP responses at consecutive 5 dB increasing mastoid stimulation levels were only obtained in all subjects using the B250 transducer at 250 Hz. Similar BC thresholds were obtained for both ipsilateral and contralateral mastoid stimulation. Forehead stimulation, if needed, may require a more powerful vibration output.

conclusionViable VEMP responses can be obtained at a considerably lower hearing level with BC stimulation than by AC stimulation. The cVEMP and oVEMP responses were similar when measured on one side and with the B250 attached to both ipsilateral and contralateral mastoids.

Indexed as

air conductionbone conductioncVEMPoVEMPVEMPvestibular investigation

Identifiers

PMID30233258
PMCPMC6134943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.