Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30233211›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2018

Comparison of efficacy and toxicity between nedaplatin and cisplatin in treating malignant pleural effusion.

Li-Zhe Zhong, Hong-Yan Xu, Zhong-Min Zhao, Guang-Mei Zhang, Feng-Wu Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Can Cisplatin Therapy Be Improved? Pathways That Can Be Targeted.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li-Zhe ZhongDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University, Jilin, China.
Hong-Yan XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Second Hospital of Jilin, Jilin, China.
Zhong-Min ZhaoDepartment of Pain, Jilin City Central Hospital, Jilin, China.
Guang-Mei ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Second Hospital of Jilin, Jilin, China.
Feng-Wu LinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China, fengwulin@hotmail.com.
Jilin City Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin versus cisplatin in treating malignant pleural effusion (MPE) caused by cancers.

methodsThe clinical data of 219 MPE patients treated from January 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Intrapleural infusion with nedaplatin 80 mg/m

resultsThere was no significant difference in the overall response rate between the nedaplatin group (62.73%) and the cisplatin group (54.13%) (

conclusionThe efficacy of pleural perfusion with nedaplatin is noninferior to cisplatin in treating malignancy-induced MPE. Nedaplatin is associated with less toxicity in comparison with cisplatin.

Indexed as

malignant pleural effusionplatinum-based drugpleural perfusiontoxicity

Identifiers

PMID30233211
PMCPMC6134960
OpenAlexW2891583736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.