ArticleNeural regeneration research2018
Microbleeds in fronto-subcortical circuits are predictive of dementia conversion in patients with vascular cognitive impairment but no dementia.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of internal jugular vein reflux on ischemic stroke with cerebral microbleeds: a prospective clinical study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Plasma extracellular vesicle proteins biomarker for cerebral small vessel disease related cognitive impairment.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Neuroimaging and Genetic Markers of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Cognitive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (NEUROGEN-SVD Study).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Developments in MRI radiomics research for vascular cognitive impairment.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- Jidong cognitive impairment cohort study: objectives, design, and baseline screening.Neural regeneration research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a common etiology of vascular cognitive impairment with no dementia (V-CIND). Studies have revealed that cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), a feature of CSVD, contribute to cognitive impairment. However, the association between CMBs and dementia conversion in individuals with V-CIND is still unclear. Here, we analyzed the predictive role of CMBs in the conversion from V-CIND to dementia in CSVD patients. We recruited and prospectively assessed 85 patients with CSVD and V-CIND. V-CIND was evaluated using a series of comprehensive neuropsychological scales, including the Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Clinical Dementia Rating. MRI assessments were used to quantify lacunar infarcts, white matter hyperintensities, CMBs, and medial temporal lobe atrophy. Eighty-two of the 85 patients completed the assessment for dementia conversion at a 1-year follow-up assessment. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine independent clinical and MRI variables associated with dementia conversion. Twenty-four patients (29.3%) had converted to dementia at the 1-year follow-up, and these individuals had significantly more CMBs in the fronto-subcortical circuits. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the patients with CMBs in the fronto-subcortical circuits (odds ratio = 4.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.602-12.081, P = 0.004) and 5 or more CMBs overall (odds ratio = 17.6, 95% confidence interval: 3.23-95.84, P = 0.001) had a significantly increased risk of dementia at the 1-year follow-up. These findings indicate that CMBs in the fronto-subcortical circuits may be predictive of dementia conversion in CSVD patients with V-CIND, and thus extend the clinical significance of CMBs. This trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR1800017077). Protocol version: 1.0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.