Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232931›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2018

Cell type-specific DNA methylation in neonatal cord tissue and cord blood: a 850K-reference panel and comparison of cell types.

Xinyi Lin, Jane Yi Lin Tan, Ai Ling Teh, Ives Yubin Lim, Samantha J Liew, Julia L MacIsaac, Yap Seng Chong, Peter D Gluckman, Michael S Kobor, Clara Yujing Cheong and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dichotomy in the Impact of Elevated Maternal Glucose Levels on Neonatal Epigenome.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xinyi Lina Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences , A*STAR , Singapore.
Jane Yi Lin Tana Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences , A*STAR , Singapore.
Ai Ling Teha Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences , A*STAR , Singapore.
Ives Yubin Lima Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences , A*STAR , Singapore.
Samantha J Liewa Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences , A*STAR , Singapore.
Julia L MacIsaacc Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, Department of Medical Genetics , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , BC , Canada.
Yap Seng Chonga Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences , A*STAR , Singapore.
Peter D Gluckmana Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences , A*STAR , Singapore.
Michael S Koborc Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, Department of Medical Genetics , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , BC , Canada.
Clara Yujing Cheonga Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences , A*STAR , Singapore.
Neerja Karnania Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences , A*STAR , Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accounting for cellular heterogeneity is essential in neonatal epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) performed on heterogeneous tissues, such as umbilical cord tissue (CT) or cord blood (CB). Using a reference-panel-based statistical approach, the cell type composition of heterogeneous tissues can be estimated by comparison of whole tissue DNA methylation profiles with cell type-specific DNA methylation signatures. Currently, there is no adequate DNA methylation reference panel for CT, and existing CB panels have been generated on lower coverage Infinium HumanMethylation450 arrays. In this study, we generate a reference panel for CT and improve available CB panels by using the higher coverage Infinium MethylationEPIC arrays. We performed DNA methylation profiling of 9 cell types isolated from CT and CB samples from 14 neonates. In addition to these cell types, we profiled DNA methylation of unfractionated CT and CB. Cell type composition of these unfractionated tissue samples, as estimated by our reference panels, was in agreement with that obtained by flow cytometry. Expectedly, DNA methylation profiles from CT and CB were distinct, reflecting their mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cell origins. Variable CpGs from both unfractionated CT and its isolated cell types were more likely to be located in open seas and intronic regions than those in CB. Cell type specific CpGs in CT were enriched in intercellular matrix pathways, while those from CB were enriched in immune-related pathways. This study provides an open source reference panel for estimation and adjustment of cellular heterogeneity in CT and CB, and broadens the scope of tissue utilization assessed in future neonatal EWAS studies.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAdultBlood CellsCpG IslandsEpigenomicsFemaleFetal BloodHumansInfant, NewbornOrgan SpecificityPregnancyReference StandardsSequence Analysis, DNAUmbilical CordCellular heterogeneityDNA methylationneonatal epigenome wide association studiesreference paneltissue-specificity

Identifiers

PMID30232931
PMCPMC6284779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.