SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2018
Sex-Specific Changes in Physical Performance Following Military Training: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Incidence and Risk Factors for the Development of Stress Fractures in Military Recruits and Qualified Personnel: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of Spaceflight on Musculoskeletal Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Considerations for Interplanetary Travel.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Pooled it
- What Are the Acute and Chronic Effects of Initial Military Training on Physiological and Neuromuscular Performance in Military Populations? A Narrative Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Sex Differences in the Metabolic Cost of a Military Load Carriage Task: A Field Based Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A comparison of role-related physical fitness between British Army trainees and trained soldiers.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
- Motivation for physical activity in the Jordanian military: Possible determinants of physical activity in male and female recruits.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025Article
- Beyond change scores: Employing an improved statistical approach to analyze the impact of entry fitness on physical performance during British Army basic training in men and women.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2024Article
- High Physical Exposure During Female Recruits' Basic Military Training in Sweden-A Descriptive Study.Military medicine · 2024Article
- Factors Influencing the Executive Functions of Male and Female Cadets.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Whey Protein Supplementation Effects on Body Composition, Performance, and Blood Biomarkers During Army Initial Entry Training.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviewsJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021Article
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.Systematic reviews · 2021Article
- Analyzing the Training Load Demands, and Influence of Sex and Body Mass, on the Tactical Task of a Casualty Drag via Surface Electromyography Wearable Technology.International journal of exercise science · 2020Article
- No Change - No Gain; The Effect of Age, Sex, Selected Genes and Training on Physiological and Performance Adaptations in Cross-Country Skiing.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMen and women joining the military undergo the same training, often in mixed-sex platoons. Given the inherent physiological and physical performance differences between men and women, it is reasonable to question whether sex differences exist in the adaptation to military training and, therefore, whether sex-specific training should be employed to optimise training adaptations.
objectiveTo systematically review the literature evaluating changes in the physical performance of men and women following military training.
methodsSix database sources were searched in addition to extensive secondary searching. Primary prospective intervention studies (all designs) evaluating physical training interventions in military populations, reporting pre- to post-training changes in physical fitness outcomes for both women and men, were included.
resultsWe screened 3966 unique records. Twenty-nine studies (n = 37 study reports) were included, most of which were conducted in the USA and evaluated initial training for military recruits. Positive changes were more consistently observed in aerobic fitness and muscle strength (whole body and upper body) outcomes than lower body strength, muscle power or muscle endurance outcomes, following physical training. Relative pre- to post-training changes for all outcome measures tended to be greater in women than men although few statistically significant sex by outcome/time interactions were observed.
conclusionImprovements in some, but not all, performance components were observed following a period of military training. Largely, these improvements were not significantly different between sexes. Further prospective research is needed to evaluate sex-specific differences in the response to physical training in controlled conditions to improve military physical training outcomes for both sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.