Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232790›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Sex-Specific Changes in Physical Performance Following Military Training: A Systematic Review.

Jo Varley-Campbell, Chris Cooper, Daryl Wilkerson, Sophie Wardle, Julie Greeves, Theo Lorenc

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Motivation for physical activity in the Jordanian military: Possible determinants of physical activity in male and female recruits.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factors Influencing the Executive Functions of Male and Female Cadets.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jo Varley-CampbellDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. jo.varley-campbell@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8980-0255
Chris CooperDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Daryl WilkersonSport and Health Science, University of Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, UK.
Sophie WardleArmy Personnel Research Capability, Army Headquarters, Andover, Hampshire, SP11 8HT, UK.
Julie GreevesArmy Personnel Research Capability, Army Headquarters, Andover, Hampshire, SP11 8HT, UK.
Theo Lorenc, London, UK.

Funding

DHCSTC TIN 3.199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMen and women joining the military undergo the same training, often in mixed-sex platoons. Given the inherent physiological and physical performance differences between men and women, it is reasonable to question whether sex differences exist in the adaptation to military training and, therefore, whether sex-specific training should be employed to optimise training adaptations.

objectiveTo systematically review the literature evaluating changes in the physical performance of men and women following military training.

methodsSix database sources were searched in addition to extensive secondary searching. Primary prospective intervention studies (all designs) evaluating physical training interventions in military populations, reporting pre- to post-training changes in physical fitness outcomes for both women and men, were included.

resultsWe screened 3966 unique records. Twenty-nine studies (n = 37 study reports) were included, most of which were conducted in the USA and evaluated initial training for military recruits. Positive changes were more consistently observed in aerobic fitness and muscle strength (whole body and upper body) outcomes than lower body strength, muscle power or muscle endurance outcomes, following physical training. Relative pre- to post-training changes for all outcome measures tended to be greater in women than men although few statistically significant sex by outcome/time interactions were observed.

conclusionImprovements in some, but not all, performance components were observed following a period of military training. Largely, these improvements were not significantly different between sexes. Further prospective research is needed to evaluate sex-specific differences in the response to physical training in controlled conditions to improve military physical training outcomes for both sexes.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalMilitary PersonnelPhysical Functional PerformanceSex CharacteristicsCardiorespiratory FitnessFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthPhysical Conditioning, Human

Identifiers

PMID30232790
PMCPMC6182553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.