Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232712›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2018

Evaluation of Possible Effects of a Potassium Channel Modulator on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Robert P Carlyon, John M Deeks, François Guérit, Wiebke Lamping, Alexander J Billig, Charles H Large, Shakeel R Saeed, Peter Harris

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. KFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Measures of Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Normal-hearing Listeners.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of Chronic Stimulation and Stimulus Level on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Listeners.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert P CarlyonMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK. bob.carlyon@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-501X
John M DeeksMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
François GuéritMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
Wiebke LampingMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
Alexander J BilligMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
Charles H LargeAutifony Therapeutics Limited, Imperial College Incubator, London, UK.
Shakeel R SaeedRoyal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, UCL Ear Institute, 330 Gray's Inn Road, London, WC1X 8DA, UK.
Peter HarrisAutifony Therapeutics Limited, Imperial College Incubator, London, UK.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBAutifony Therapeutics (United Kingdom) · GBRoyal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC-A060-5PQ72Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal processing by cochlear implant listeners is degraded and is affected by auditory deprivation. The fast-acting Kv3.1 potassium channel is important for sustained temporally accurate firing and is also susceptible to deprivation, the effects of which can be partially restored in animals by the molecule AUT00063. We report the results of a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind study on psychophysical tests of the effects of AUT00063 on temporal processing by CI listeners. The study measured the upper limit of temporal pitch, gap detection, and discrimination of low rates (centred on 120 pps) for monopolar pulse trains presented to an apical electrode. The upper limit was measured using the optimally efficient midpoint comparison (MPC) pitch-ranking procedure; thresholds were obtained for the other two measures using an adaptive procedure. Twelve CI users (MedEl and Cochlear) were tested before and after two periods of AUT00063 or placebo in a within-subject crossover study. No significant differences occurred between post-drug and post-placebo conditions. This absence of effect occurred despite high test-retest reliability for all three measures, obtained by comparing performance on the two baseline visits, and despite the demonstrated sensitivity of the measures to modest changes in temporal processing obtained in other studies from our laboratory. Hence, we have no evidence that AUT00063 improves temporal processing for the doses and patient population employed.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAgedAged, 80 and overAuditory PerceptionCross-Over StudiesDeafnessDouble-Blind MethodHearing TestsHumansImidazolesMiddle AgedPyrimidinesShaw Potassium ChannelsAUT00063ImidazolesKCNC1 protein, humanPyrimidinesShaw Potassium ChannelsAUT00063cochlear implant (CI)gap detection threshold (GDT)kv3.1midpoint comparison procedure (MPC)rate discrimination ratio (RDR)temporal processing

Identifiers

PMID30232712
PMCPMC6249161
OpenAlexW2889587148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.