ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2019
Obstructive sleep apnea in pregnancy: performance of a rapid screening tool.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postpartum continuous epidural analgesia on pain, sleep quality, and emotional state in childbearing women: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- A Relation between Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy and Delivering Small for Gestational Age Infant-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Managing Pregnancy and Nursing Affecting African American Women with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical Outcomes and Parenthood.Medical research archives · 2023Article
- Impact of sleep patterns upon female neuroendocrinology and reproductive outcomes: a comprehensive review.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2022Review
- Prediction Models of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Model Performance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Update in Sleep 2019.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020Review
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea Is Associated with Newly Diagnosed Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2020Article
- A Screening Algorithm for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2019Article
- Exploring Fetal Sex as a Risk Factor for Sleep Disordered Breathing and Its Complications in Pregnancy.Gender and the genomeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Sleep Apnea Symptom Score (SASS) has been commonly used to assess obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the SASS and the predictive value of SASS incorporating bedpartner-reported information in identifying OSA in pregnant women.
methodsA cohort of healthy pregnant women completed the SASS and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Participants underwent overnight laboratory polysomnography (PSG) monitoring. Reliability and validity of the SASS were evaluated. A multivariable predictive model, incorporating the SASS score along with BMI, age, and bedpartner-reported information, was developed to assess the risk for OSA (AHI ≥ 5 events/h). Receiver operating characteristic curves for OSA were constructed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the predictive model.
resultsA total of 126 and 105 participants completed the PSG during the first and third trimester, respectively. The SASS demonstrated adequate validity and acceptable reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.72 during the third trimester). When the combined model consisting of SASS, age, BMI, and bedpartner-reported information was used, the area under the curve for AHI ≥ 5 for the first and third trimester was 0.781 (95%CI 0.648, 0.914) and 0.842 (95%CI 0.732, 0.952), respectively; the sensitivity/specificity was 76.9%/72.4% and 82.4%/78.0%, respectively.
conclusionsThe SASS alone has acceptable reliability and validity, but limited predictive values. A new tool, combining the SASS and other patient characteristics (i.e., age, BMI, and bedpartner-reported snoring and breathing pauses), demonstrated improved sensitivity and specificity, and thus may have greater utility in clinical practice for predicting OSA in pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.