Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232680›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2019

Obstructive sleep apnea in pregnancy: performance of a rapid screening tool.

Bilgay Izci Balserak, Bingqian Zhu, Michael A Grandner, Nicholas Jackson, Grace W Pien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Update in Sleep 2019.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. A Screening Algorithm for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bilgay Izci BalserakCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bingqian ZhuSchool of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 227 S Chongqing Rd, Shanghai, 200025, China. zhubq@shsmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3997-7882
Michael A GrandnerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Nicholas JacksonDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Grace W PienSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM/RESPIRATORY NEUROBIOLOGY AND SLEEPT32HL007713 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PACK, ALLAN I · 1992 to 2022
$11.9M
Longitudinal Study--Sleep-Disordered Breathing/PregnancyK23HD041465 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PIEN, GRACE W · 2002 to 2006
$651k
Sleep-Related Determinants of Gestational DiabetesK99NR013187 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI IZCI BALSERAK, BILGAY · 2012 to 2013
$180k
National Institutes of Health T32 HL07713; 5K23HD041465NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007713NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD041465NINR NIH HHS K99 NR013187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Sleep Apnea Symptom Score (SASS) has been commonly used to assess obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the SASS and the predictive value of SASS incorporating bedpartner-reported information in identifying OSA in pregnant women.

methodsA cohort of healthy pregnant women completed the SASS and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Participants underwent overnight laboratory polysomnography (PSG) monitoring. Reliability and validity of the SASS were evaluated. A multivariable predictive model, incorporating the SASS score along with BMI, age, and bedpartner-reported information, was developed to assess the risk for OSA (AHI ≥ 5 events/h). Receiver operating characteristic curves for OSA were constructed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the predictive model.

resultsA total of 126 and 105 participants completed the PSG during the first and third trimester, respectively. The SASS demonstrated adequate validity and acceptable reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.72 during the third trimester). When the combined model consisting of SASS, age, BMI, and bedpartner-reported information was used, the area under the curve for AHI ≥ 5 for the first and third trimester was 0.781 (95%CI 0.648, 0.914) and 0.842 (95%CI 0.732, 0.952), respectively; the sensitivity/specificity was 76.9%/72.4% and 82.4%/78.0%, respectively.

conclusionsThe SASS alone has acceptable reliability and validity, but limited predictive values. A new tool, combining the SASS and other patient characteristics (i.e., age, BMI, and bedpartner-reported snoring and breathing pauses), demonstrated improved sensitivity and specificity, and thus may have greater utility in clinical practice for predicting OSA in pregnant women.

Indexed as

AdultBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPolysomnographyPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSleep Apnea, ObstructivePregnancyScreeningSensitivitySleep apneaSpecificity

Identifiers

PMID30232680
PMCPMC6424647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.