Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232676›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2018

Examining the effectiveness of a coordinated perinatal mental health care model using an intersectional-feminist perspective.

Natalie R Stevens, Nicole M Heath, Teresa A Lillis, Kenleigh McMinn, Vanessa Tirone, Mervat Sha'ini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Use of Intersectionality Theory in Interventional Health Research in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Exploring the Application of Intersectionality as a Path toward Equity in Perinatal Health: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie R StevensRush University Medical Center, 1645 West Jackson Blvd. Ste. 400, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. Natalie_Stevens@rush.edu.
Nicole M HeathRush University Medical Center, 1645 West Jackson Blvd. Ste. 400, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Teresa A LillisRush University Medical Center, 1645 West Jackson Blvd. Ste. 400, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Kenleigh McMinnRush University Medical Center, 1645 West Jackson Blvd. Ste. 400, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Vanessa TironeRush University Medical Center, 1645 West Jackson Blvd. Ste. 400, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Mervat Sha'iniRush University Medical Center, 1645 West Jackson Blvd. Ste. 400, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Untreated perinatal depression and anxiety are significant public health problems that disproportionately affect ethno-racial minorities. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a coordinated perinatal mental health care model, focusing on socially-disadvantaged, ethno-racial minority women, with an intersectional-feminist perspective. The treatment model was grounded in intersectionality theory with the aim of addressing complex social vulnerability factors in the context of perinatal mental health treatment. Participants were 67 perinatal women (64% African American or Hispanic/Latina) referred by medical providers at an urban teaching hospital. Results demonstrated high treatment engagement and effectiveness, with 65.9% of participants demonstrating reliable improvement in symptoms. Moreover, African American and Hispanic/Latina patients had similar treatment outcomes compared to White patients, despite facing greater socio-economic disadvantages. Findings indicate that the treatment model may be a promising approach to reducing perinatal mental health disparities. Strengths and limitations of the study are discussed within the intersectionality framework.

Indexed as

AdultBlack or African AmericanDepression, PostpartumEthnicityFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHispanic or LatinoHumansMental Health ServicesModels, OrganizationalMothersPerinatal CareWhite PeopleYoung AdultClinical practiceDisparitiesEffectiveness researchIntersectionality theoryPerinatal mental healthTreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID30232676
OpenAlexW2891034723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.