Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232547›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2018

Auditory-vocal coupling in the naked mole-rat, a mammal with poor auditory thresholds.

Kazuo Okanoya, Shigeto Yosida, Catherine M Barone, Daniel T Applegate, Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell, Robert J Dooling, Thomas J Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Housing and Husbandry Alternatives for Naked Mole Rat Colonies Used in Research Settings.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  5. Auditory brainstem development of naked mole-rats (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Not just a cousin of the naked mole-rat: Damaraland mole-rats offer unique insights into biomedicine.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kazuo OkanoyaDepartment of Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeto YosidaDepartment of Cognitive and Information Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Catherine M BaroneDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Daniel T ApplegateDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elizabeth F Brittan-PowellDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Robert J DoolingDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Thomas J ParkDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA. tpark@uic.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2447-2948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naked mole-rats are extremely social and extremely vocal rodents, displaying a wide range of functionally distinct call types and vocalizing almost continuously. Their vocalizations are low frequency, and a behavioral audiogram has shown that naked mole-rats, like other subterranean mammals, hear only low frequencies. Hence, the frequency range of their hearing and vocalizations appears to be well matched. However, even at low frequencies, naked mole-rats show very poor auditory thresholds, suggesting vocal communication may be effective only over short distances. However, in a tunnel environment where low frequency sounds propagate well and background noise is low, it may be that vocalizations travel considerable distances at suprathreshold intensities. Here, we confirmed hearing sensitivity using the auditory brainstem response; we characterized signature and alarm calls in intensity and frequency domains and we measured the effects of propagation through tubes with the diameter of naked mole-rat tunnels. Signature calls-used for intimate communication-could travel 3-8 m at suprathreshold intensities, and alarm calls (lower frequency and higher intensity), could travel up to 15 m. Despite this species' poor hearing sensitivity, the naked mole-rat displays a functional, coupled auditory-vocal communication system-a hallmark principle of acoustic communication systems across taxa.

Indexed as

AcousticsAnimalsAuditory PerceptionBrain StemEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleGerbillinaeMaleMole RatsSocial BehaviorSound SpectrographyVocalization, AnimalAlarm callAuditory brainstem responseAuditory thresholdSignature callVocal communication

Identifiers

PMID30232547
PMCPMC6208660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.