Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232537›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2018

Impact of prescription drugs on second fragility fractures among US Medicare patients.

J C Munson, J P W Bynum, J-E Bell, C McDonough, Q Wang, T Tosteson, A N A Tosteson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J C MunsonThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA. Jeffrey.C.Munson@hitchcock.org.
J P W BynumThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.
J-E BellThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.
C McDonoughSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Q WangThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.
T TostesonThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.
A N A TostesonThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USDartmouth College · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Outcomes Calculators for Informed Decision Making in Back SurgeryP60AR062799 · NIAMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TOSTESON, ANNA N. A. · 2012 to 2016
$6.1M
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases P60-AR062799NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR062799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drugs that increase the risk of fracture are commonly prescribed to survivors of a fragility fracture. This study shows that starting new high-risk medications after fracture increases the risk of a second, potentially preventable fracture. For most drug classes, however, it is safe to continue medications taken before the fracture.

introductionMost patients who survive a fragility fracture are subsequently exposed to prescription drugs that have been linked to increased fracture risk. This study was designed to quantify the extent to which current prescribing practices result in potentially preventable second fractures.

methodsWe analyzed a cohort of 138,526 Medicare beneficiaries who returned to the community after a fragility fracture. Post-fracture drug use was defined using retail pharmacy fills. The risk of second fracture associated with individual drug classes was analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. Data were further analyzed to determine whether there is a difference in risk between continuing previous therapy and initiating new therapy after fracture.

resultsMany drug classes previously identified as increasing fracture risk were not associated with increased fracture risk in this cohort. Discontinuing therapy at the time of fracture was only beneficial for patients taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; however, initiating therapy in previous non-users increased second fracture risk for five classes of drugs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotics, proton pump inhibitors, and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics).

conclusionDiscontinuing high-risk drugs after fracture was not generally protective against subsequent fractures. Preventing the addition of new medications may result in greater improvements in post-fracture care.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansMaleMedicareOsteoporotic FracturesPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription DrugsRecurrenceRisk AssessmentUnited StatesPrescription DrugsMedicareOsteoporosisPharmacoepidemiologySecond fracture

Identifiers

PMID30232537
PMCPMC6277051
OpenAlexW2889826312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.