Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232509›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2018

Prognostic value of plasma MR-proADM vs NT-proBNP for heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes: the SURDIAGENE prospective study.

Mathilde Fraty, Gilberto Velho, Elise Gand, Fréderic Fumeron, Stéphanie Ragot, Philippe Sosner, Kamel Mohammedi, Barnabas Gellen, Pierre-Jean Saulnier, Jean-Michel Halimi and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Translational studies of adrenomedullin and related peptides regarding cardiovascular diseases.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mathilde FratyCentre d'Investigation Clinique, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France. Mathilde.fraty@gmail.com.
Gilberto VelhoCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Inserm UMR_S 1138, Paris, France.
Elise GandPole DUNE (Digestif, Urologie, Néphrologie, Endocrinologie), CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Fréderic FumeronCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Inserm UMR_S 1138, Paris, France.
Stéphanie RagotCentre d'Investigation Clinique, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Philippe SosnerCentre médico-sportif MON STADE, Paris, France.
Kamel MohammediService Endocrinologie, Diabétologie, Nutrition, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
Barnabas GellenService de Cardiologie, Polyclinique de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Pierre-Jean SaulnierCentre d'Investigation Clinique, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Jean-Michel HalimiService Néphrologie, Dialyse et Transplantation, CHU de Tours, Tours, France.
David MontaigneClinique de Physiologie et Département d'Échocardiographie, CHRU Lille, Lille, France.
Grégory DucrocqUFR de Médecine, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Michaela RehmanCentre d'Investigation Clinique, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Michel MarreCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Inserm UMR_S 1138, Paris, France.
Ronan RousselCentre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Inserm UMR_S 1138, Paris, France.
Samy HadjadjCentre d'Investigation Clinique, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France. samy.hadjadj@gmail.com.
SURDIAGENE Study Group
Inserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisN-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is the gold standard prognostic biomarker for diagnosis and occurrence of heart failure. Here, we compared its prognostic value for the occurrence of congestive heart failure with that of plasma mid-region pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), a surrogate for adrenomedullin, a vasoactive peptide with vasodilator and natriuretic properties, in people with type 2 diabetes.

methodsPlasma MR-proADM concentration was measured in baseline samples of a hospital-based cohort of consecutively recruited participants with type 2 diabetes. Our primary endpoint was heart failure requiring hospitalisation.

resultsWe included 1438 participants (age 65 ± 11 years; 604 women and 834 men). Hospitalisation for heart failure occurred during follow-up (median 64 months) in 206 participants; the incidence rate of heart failure was 2.5 (95% CI 2.2, 2.9) per 100 person-years. Plasma concentrations of MR-proADM and NT-proBNP were significantly associated with heart failure in a Cox multivariable analysis model when adjusted for age, diabetes duration, history of coronary heart disease, proteinuria and baseline eGFR ( CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationMR-proADM is a prognostic biomarker for heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes but gives no significant complementary information on prediction of heart failure compared with NT-proBNP.

Indexed as

AdrenomedullinAgedBiomarkersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainNeuropeptidesPeptide FragmentsPrognosisProspective StudiesAdrenomedullinBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainNeuropeptidesPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)AdrenomedullinBiomarkersBNPHeart failureNT-proBNPPrognosisType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30232509
OpenAlexW2891162798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.