Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232499›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2018

Resource allocation optimization with multi-trait genomic prediction for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) baking quality.

Bettina Lado, Daniel Vázquez, Martin Quincke, Paula Silva, Ignacio Aguilar, Lucia Gutiérrez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improving multi-trait genomic prediction using synthetic traits from hyperspectral data based on co-heritability.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bettina LadoDepartment of Statistics, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Garzón 780, 12900, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Daniel VázquezInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Est. Exp. La Estanzuela, Ruta 50 km 11.5, 70006, Colonia, Uruguay.
Martin QuinckeInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Est. Exp. La Estanzuela, Ruta 50 km 11.5, 70006, Colonia, Uruguay.
Paula SilvaInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Est. Exp. La Estanzuela, Ruta 50 km 11.5, 70006, Colonia, Uruguay.
Ignacio AguilarInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Est. Exp. Las Brujas, Ruta 48 km 10, Rincón del Colorado, 90200, Canelones, Uruguay.
Lucia GutiérrezDepartment of Statistics, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Garzón 780, 12900, Montevideo, Uruguay. gutierrezcha@wisc.edu.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación POS_NAC_2013_1_11261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageMulti-trait genomic prediction models are useful to allocate available resources in breeding programs by targeted phenotyping of correlated traits when predicting expensive and labor-intensive quality parameters. Multi-trait genomic prediction models can be used to predict labor-intensive or expensive correlated traits where phenotyping depth of correlated traits could be larger than phenotyping depth of targeted traits, reducing resources and improving prediction accuracy. This is particularly important in the context of allocating phenotyping resource in plant breeding programs. The objective of this work was to evaluate multi-trait models predictive ability with different depth of phenotypic information from correlated traits. We evaluated 495 wheat advanced breeding lines for eight baking quality traits which were genotyped with genotyping-by-sequencing. Through different approaches for cross-validation, we evaluated the predictive ability of a single-trait model and a multi-trait model. Moreover, we evaluated different sizes of the training population (from 50 to 396 individuals) for the trait of interest, different depth of phenotypic information for correlated traits (50 and 100%) and the number of correlated traits to be used (one to three). There was no loss in the predictive ability by reducing the training population up to a 30% (149 individuals) when using correlated traits. A multi-trait model with one highly correlated trait phenotyped for both the training and testing sets was the best model considering phenotyping resources and the gain in predictive ability. The inclusion of correlated traits in the training and testing lines is a strategic approach to replace phenotyping of labor-intensive and high cost traits in a breeding program.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantModels, GeneticPlant BreedingCookingGenomicsGenotypePhenotypeTriticum

Identifiers

PMID30232499
PMCPMC6244535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.