Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232319›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

Usability Study of the User-Interface of Intensive Care Ventilators Based on User Test and Eye-Tracking Signals.

Mingyin Jiang, Shenglin Liu, Qingmin Feng, Jiaqi Gao, Qiang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Eye tracking metrics to screen and assess cognitive impairment in patients with neurological disorders.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Review
  7. Subjective and Objective Quantification of the Effect of Distraction on Physician's Workload and Performance During Simulated Laparoscopic Surgery.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mingyin JiangDepartment of Medical Engineering, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Shenglin LiuDepartment of Medical Engineering, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Qingmin FengDepartment of Medical Engineering, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Jiaqi GaoDepartment of Medical Engineering, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Qiang ZhangDepartment of Medical Engineering, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the ergonomics of the user-interface for 3 intensive care ventilators, and identify usability problems leading to user errors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixteen respiratory therapists were recruited to perform 6 specific user-interface operational tasks on ventilators. Data (task completion time, pupil diameter, average slope of pupil diameter change, and subjective evaluation) were collected through objective measurement, questionnaires, and an eye-tracking instrument. RESULTS For task completion time, there were significant differences among ventilators in recognition tasks of ventilator mode and settings (P<0.05), modification of ventilator modes and recognizing (P<0.05) and changing alarm settings (P<0.05). A mean of 15±2 task failures was observed for each ventilator. For the change of pupil diameter, a significant difference was observed between ventilators (except task 2, P<0.05). For average slope of pupil diameter change, a significant difference was also observed between ventilators (except task 2, P<0.05). The Servo I showed a better correlation between task completion time and pupil diameter change. The subjective evaluation results were clear: Evital 4 received worst scores in terms of friendliness of user-interface, information display and safety (respectively, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The present study provided valuable evidence to indicate the ergonomic of ventilators now used in China. With the result of this study, we can infer that the Evital 4 were poorly ergonomic designed. Furthermore, the study also demonstrated that eye-tracking can be a promising tool to evaluate the ergonomics of the user-interface.

Indexed as

User-Computer InterfaceChinaCritical CareEquipment DesignErgonomicsEye Movement MeasurementsHumansIntensive Care UnitsRespiration, ArtificialSimulation TrainingSurveys and QuestionnairesVentilators, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID30232319
PMCPMC6161566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.