Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232240›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018

Imaging and analysis of a three-dimensional spider web architecture.

Isabelle Su, Zhao Qin, Tomás Saraceno, Adrian Krell, Roland Mühlethaler, Ally Bisshop, Markus J Buehler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biomimetic Silk Architectures Outperform Animal Horns in Strength and Toughness.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Design, manufacture, and testing of customized sterilizable respirator.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2022
    Article
  7. In situ three-dimensional spider web construction and mechanics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Orb-web spiders as Bayesian learners.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isabelle SuLaboratory for Atomistic and Molecular Mechanics (LAMM), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Zhao QinLaboratory for Atomistic and Molecular Mechanics (LAMM), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Tomás SaracenoStudio Tomás Saraceno, Hauptstrasse 11/12, 10317 Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany.
Adrian KrellStudio Tomás Saraceno, Hauptstrasse 11/12, 10317 Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany.
Roland MühlethalerStudio Tomás Saraceno, Hauptstrasse 11/12, 10317 Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany.
Ally BisshopStudio Tomás Saraceno, Hauptstrasse 11/12, 10317 Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany.
Markus J BuehlerLaboratory for Atomistic and Molecular Mechanics (LAMM), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA mbuehler@mit.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4173-9659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiders are abundantly found in nature and most ecosystems, making up more than 47 000 species. This ecological success is in part due to the exceptional mechanics of the spider web, with its strength, toughness, elasticity and robustness, which originate from its hierarchical structures all the way from sequence design to web architecture. It is a unique example in nature of high-performance material design. In particular, to survive in different environments, spiders have optimized and adapted their web architecture by providing housing, protection, and an efficient tool for catching prey. The most studied web in literature is the two-dimensional (2D) orb web, which is composed of radial and spiral threads. However, only 10% of spider species are orb-web weavers, and three-dimensional (3D) webs, such as funnel, sheet or cobwebs, are much more abundant in nature. The complex spatial network and microscale size of silk fibres are significant challenges towards determining the topology of 3D webs, and only a limited number of previous studies have attempted to quantify their structure and properties. Here, we focus on developing an innovative experimental method to directly capture the complete digital 3D spider web architecture with micron scale resolution. We built an automatic segmentation and scanning platform to obtain high-resolution 2D images of individual cross-sections of the web that were illuminated by a sheet laser. We then developed image processing algorithms to reconstruct the digital 3D fibrous network by analysing the 2D images. This digital network provides a model that contains all of the structural and topological features of the porous regions of a 3D web with high fidelity, and when combined with a mechanical model of silk materials, will allow us to directly simulate and predict the mechanical response of a realistic 3D web under mechanical loads. Our work provides a practical tool to capture the architecture of sophisticated 3D webs, and could lead to studies of the relation between architecture, material and biological functions for numerous 3D spider web applications.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaElasticityImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalPattern Recognition, AutomatedSilkSpidersStress, MechanicalSilk3D spider webbiomaterialfibreimagingmodellingstructure

Identifiers

PMID30232240
PMCPMC6170774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.