Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232167›Full record

ReviewmSphere2018

Bats Are an Untapped System for Understanding Microbiome Evolution in Mammals.

Melissa R Ingala, Nancy B Simmons, Susan L Perkins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mSphere, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bacterial Composition Across Bat Species: A Human Health Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of animal hosts in shaping gut microbiome variation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Assessing the threat of bat-associated fungal pathogens.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Review
  14. Serological evidence of virus infection inFrontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melissa R IngalaRichard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA ingala.melissar@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9866-5646
Nancy B SimmonsRichard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA.
Susan L PerkinsRichard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammals evolved in a microbial world, and consequently, microbial symbionts have played a role in their evolution. An exciting new subdiscipline of metagenomics considers the ways in which microbes, particularly those found in the gut, have facilitated the ecological and phylogenetic radiation of mammals. However, the vast majority of such studies focus on domestic animals, laboratory models, or charismatic megafauna (e.g., pandas and chimpanzees). The result is a plethora of studies covering few taxa across the mammal tree of life, leaving broad patterns of microbiome function and evolution unclear. Wildlife microbiome research urgently needs a model system in which to test hypotheses about metagenomic involvement in host ecology and evolution. We propose that bats (Order: Chiroptera) represent a model system ideal for comparative microbiome research, affording opportunities to examine host phylogeny, diet, and other natural history characteristics in relation to the evolution of the gut microbiome.

Indexed as

DietMetagenomicsAnimalsChiropteraEcologyGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansPhylogenybatsChiropteramacroevolutionmicrobial ecologymicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID30232167
PMCPMC6147128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.