ArticleBMJ open2018
Classic e-Delphi survey to provide national consensus and establish priorities with regards to the factors that promote the implementation and continued development of non-medical prescribing within health services in Wales.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Essential Factors That Support National Implementation of Designated Registered Nurse Prescribing: A Systems-Thinking Approach.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary perspectives on pediatric nurse prescribing: a mixed-methods analysis of attitudes and consensus.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Reaching experts for enhanced referral (REFER) to pain psychology: a modified Delphi approach with multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers at a specialised center in the USA.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
- Comparing independent prescribing to patient group direction use in a general practitioner out-of-hours service: a retrospective cross-sectional service evaluation.British paramedic journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Validating a framework to guide the implementation of high-quality virtual primary care: an international eDelphi study protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- WAO consensus on DEfinition of Food Allergy SEverity (DEFASE).The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023Article
- Developing tailored intervention strategies for implementation of stratified care to low back pain with physiotherapists in Nigeria: a Delphi study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Article
- Experiences and opinions of multi-professional non-medical oncology prescribers on post-qualification training: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022Article
- Extended Prescribing Roles for Pharmacists in Poland-A Survey Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Diabetes Capabilities for the Healthcare Workforce Identified via a 3-Staged Modified Delphi Technique.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum: An e-Delphi study for competencies.PloS one · 2022Article
- Eliciting and prioritising determinants of improved care in multimorbidity: A modified online Delphi study.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo provide national consensus and establish priorities with regards to the factors that promote the implementation and continued development of non-medical prescribing within health services.
designClassic e-Delphi survey.
settingNational study in Wales.
participantsPharmacists, nurses and allied health professionals with the independent/supplementary prescribing qualification.
resultsA total of 55 non-medical prescribers agreed to become members of the expert panel of whom 42 (76%) completed the round 1 questionnaire, 40/42 (95%) completed round 2 and 34/40 (85%) responded to round 3. Twenty-one statements were developed, and consensus was achieved on nine factors representing those necessary for the successful implementation of non-medical prescribing and five representing actions required for its continued development. Strategic fit between non-medical prescribing and existing service provision, organisation preparedness, visible benefits, good managerial and team support, and a clear differentiation of roles were each important influences.
conclusionGiven the high degree of consensus, this list of factors and actions should provide guidance to managers and commissioners of services wishing to initiate or extend non-medical prescribing. This information should be considered internationally by other countries outside of the UK wishing to implement prescribing by non-medical healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.