Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232111›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Partners at Care Transitions: exploring healthcare professionals' perspectives of excellence at care transitions for older people.

Ruth Baxter, Jane O'Hara, Jenni Murray, Laura Sheard, Alison Cracknell, Robbie Foy, John Wright, Rebecca Lawton

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unpacking the Cinderella black box of complex intervention development through the Partners at Care Transitions (PACT) programme of research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruth BaxterYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7631-2786
Jane O'HaraYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
Jenni MurrayYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
Laura SheardYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
Alison CracknellLeeds Centre for Older People's Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Robbie FoyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
John WrightYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
Rebecca LawtonYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1214-20017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHospital admissions are shorter than they were 10 years ago. Notwithstanding the benefits of this, patients often leave hospital requiring ongoing care. The transition period can therefore be risky, particularly for older people with complex health and social care needs. Previous research has predominantly focused on the errors and harms that occur during transitions of care. In contrast, this study adopts an asset-based approach to learn from factors that facilitate safe outcomes. It seeks to explore how staff within high-performing ('positively deviant') teams successfully support transitions from hospital to home for older people. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Six high-performing general practices and six hospital specialties that demonstrate exceptionally low or reducing 30-day emergency hospital readmission rates will be invited to participate in the study. Healthcare staff from these clinical teams will be recruited to take part in focus groups, individual interviews and/or observations of staff meetings. Data collection will explore the ways in which teams successfully deliver exceptionally safe transitional care and how they overcome the challenges faced in their everyday clinical work. Data will be thematically analysed using a pen portrait approach to identify the manifest (explicit) and latent (abstract) factors that facilitate success. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Leeds. The study will help develop our understanding of how multidisciplinary staff within different healthcare settings successfully support care transitions for older people. Findings will be disseminated to academic and clinical audiences through peer-reviewed articles, conferences and workshops. Findings will also inform the development of an intervention to improve the safety and experience of older people during transitions from hospital to home.

Indexed as

General PractitionersHospitalistsPatient TransferTransitional CareAgedCooperative BehaviorFemaleGeriatricsHumansIntersectoral CollaborationMalePatient DischargePatient ReadmissionQuality ImprovementRisk AdjustmentUnited Kingdomgeriatric medicineprimary carequalitative researchquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID30232111
PMCPMC6150145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.