Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232106›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Geographical and socioeconomic differences in uptake of Pap test and mammography in Italy: results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Alessio Petrelli, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Lisa Francovich, Barbara Giordani, Anteo Di Napoli, Marco Zappa, Concetta Mirisola, Lidia Gargiulo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Seasonal Mortality and its Impact on Spatial Inequality in Life Expectancy Across Italy.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2025
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Breast Cancer Prevention: The Key Role of Population Screening, Breast Self-Examination (BSE) and Technological Tools. Survey of Italian Women.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Geographic Inequalities in Breast Cancer in Italy: Trend Analysis of Mortality and Risk Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alessio PetrelliEpidemiology Unit, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP), Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7533-7260
Paolo Giorgi RossiEpidemiology Unit, AUSL Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Lisa FrancovichDirezione centrale delle statistiche socio-demografiche e ambientale, National Institute of Statistics (Istat), Rome, Lazio, Italy.
Barbara GiordaniEpidemiology Unit, Local Health Authority TO3, Grugliasco, Piemonte, Italy.
Anteo Di NapoliEpidemiology Unit, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP), Rome, Italy.
Marco ZappaInstitute for Cancer Research and Prevention (ISPO), Italian National Screening Monitoring Centre, Florence, Italy.
Concetta MirisolaEpidemiology Unit, National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP), Rome, Italy.
Lidia GargiuloDirezione centrale delle statistiche socio-demografiche e ambientale, National Institute of Statistics (Istat), Rome, Lazio, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Italian National Health Service instituted cervical and breast cancer screening programmes in 1999; the local health authorities have a mandate to implement these screening programmes by inviting all women aged 25-64 years for a Pap test every 3 years (or for an Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) test every 5 years) and women aged 50-69 years for a mammography every 2 years. However, the implementation of screening programmes throughout the country is still incomplete. This study aims to: (1) describe cervical and breast cancer screening uptake and (2) evaluate geographical and individual socioeconomic difference in screening uptake.

methodsData both from the Italian National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) conducted by the National Institute of Statistics in 2012-2013 and from the Italian National Centre for Screening Monitoring (INCSM) were used. The NHIS interviewed a national representative random sample of 32 831 women aged 25-64 years and of 16 459 women aged 50-69 years. Logistic multilevel models were used to estimate the effect of socioeconomic variables and behavioural factors (level 1) on screening uptake. Data on screening invitation coverage at the regional level, taken from INCSM, were used as ecological (level 2) covariates.

resultsTotal 3-year Pap test and 2-year mammography uptake were 62.1% and 56.4%, respectively; screening programmes accounted for 1/3 and 1/2 of total test uptake, respectively. Strong geographical differences were observed. Uptake was associated with high educational levels, healthy behaviours, being a former smoker and being Italian versus foreign national. Differences in uptake between Italian regions were mostly explained by the invitation coverage to screening programmes.

conclusionsThe uptake of both screening programmes in Italy is still under acceptable levels. Screening programme implementation has the potential to reduce the health inequalities gap between regions but only if uptake increases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEducational StatusEmploymentEx-SmokersFemaleGeographyHealth BehaviorHealth SurveysHumansItalyMammographyMiddle AgedOccupationsgeographicimmigrantsitalymammographypap testsocioeconomic

Identifiers

PMID30232106
PMCPMC6150150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.