Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30232094›Full record

Trial reportArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2019

Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring.

Lynn Thomson, Daniela Elleri, Simon Bond, James Howlett, David B Dunger, Kathryn Beardsall

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Feasibility of automated insulin delivery guided by continuous glucose monitoring in preterm infants.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2020
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Agreement between intermittent glucose concentrations and continuous glucose monitoring in at-risk newborns.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Dilemmas in parenteral glucose delivery and approach to glucose monitoring and interpretation in the neonate.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lynn ThomsonDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Daniela ElleriDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Simon BondCambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
James HowlettMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK.
David B DungerDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Kathryn BeardsallDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3582-183X
University of Cambridge · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/133/07Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_12012/5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHyperglycaemia is common in very preterm infants and is associated with adverse outcomes. Preventing hyperglycaemia without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia is difficult. Real time tracking with continuous glucose monitors (CGM) may improve glucose control. We assessed the feasibility and safety of CGM to target glucose control in preterm infants, to inform a randomised controlled trial (RCT).

designWe performed a single centre study in very preterm infants during the first week of life. Accuracy was assessed by comparison of CGM with blood glucose levels (n=20 infants). In a separate pilot study of efficacy (n=20), real-time CGM combined with a paper guideline to target glucose control (2.6-10 mmol/L) was compared with standard neonatal care (masked CGM). Questionnaires were used to assess staff acceptability.

resultsNo concerns were raised about infection or skin integrity at sensor site. The sensor performed well compared with point-of-care blood glucose measurements, mean bias of -0.27 (95% CI -0.35 to -0.19). Per cent time in target range (sensor glucose 2.6-10 mmol/L) was greater with CGM than POC (77% vs 59%, respectively) and per cent time sensor glucose >10 mmol/L was less with CGM than POC (24% vs 40%, respectively). The CGM also detected clinically unsuspected episodes of hypoglycaemia. Staff reported that the use of the CGM positively improved clinical care.

conclusionsThis study suggests that CGM has sufficient accuracy and utility in preterm infants to warrant formal testing in a RCT.

Indexed as

Infant CareBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMalePilot ProjectsBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobincontinuous glucose monitoringglucosehyperglycaemiahypoglycaemia

Identifiers

PMID30232094
PMCPMC6764251
OpenAlexW2891979812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.