ArticleCancer communications (London, England)2018
Transcriptomic but not genomic variability confers phenotype of breast cancer stem cells.
Article in Cancer communications (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving the Characteristics of Fruiting Bodies inMetabolites · 2024Article
- Advancing precision and personalized breast cancer treatment through multi-omics technologies.American journal of cancer research · 2024Review
- Omics Technologies Improving Breast Cancer Research and Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- A Focus on the Synergy of Radiomics and RNA Sequencing in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Analysis of Breast Cancer Differences between China and Western Countries Based on Radiogenomics.Genes · 2022Article
- Single-cell RNA sequencing in oral science: Current awareness and perspectives.Cell proliferation · 2022Review
- A model for the intrinsic limit of cancer therapy: Duality of treatment-induced cell death and treatment-induced stemness.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- SIA-IgG confers poor prognosis and represents a novel therapeutic target in breast cancer.Bioengineered · 2022Article
- VLDLR disturbs quiescence of breast cancer stem cells in a ligand-independent function.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Reduction of a stochastic model of gene expression: Lagrangian dynamics gives access to basins of attraction as cell types and metastabilty.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Single-cell RNA sequencing in cancer: Applications, advances, and emerging challenges.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2021Review
- Single cell RNA sequencing for breast cancer: present and future.Cell death discovery · 2021Review
- Mitochondrial DNA alterations may influence the cisplatin responsiveness of oral squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Comparison of the Genomic Profile of Cancer Stem Cells and Their Non-Stem Counterpart: The Case of Ovarian Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- IGF2BP2 Promotes Liver Cancer Growth Through an m6A-FEN1-Dependent Mechanism.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- The Evolving Landscape of Cancer Stem Cells and Ways to Overcome Cancer Heterogeneity.Cancers · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) are considered responsible for cancer relapse and drug resistance. Understanding the identity of BCSCs may open new avenues in breast cancer therapy. Although several discoveries have been made on BCSC characterization, the factors critical to the origination of BCSCs are largely unclear. This study aimed to determine whether genomic mutations contribute to the acquisition of cancer stem-like phenotype and to investigate the genetic and transcriptional features of BCSCs.
methodsWe detected potential BCSC phenotype-associated mutation hotspot regions by using whole-genome sequencing on parental cancer cells and derived serial-generation spheres in increasing order of BCSC frequency, and then performed target deep DNA sequencing at bulk-cell and single-cell levels. To identify the transcriptional program associated with BCSCs, bulk-cell and single-cell RNA sequencing was performed.
resultsBy using whole-genome sequencing of bulk cells, potential BCSC phenotype-associated mutation hotspot regions were detected. Validation by target deep DNA sequencing, at both bulk-cell and single-cell levels, revealed no genetic changes specifically associated with BCSC phenotype. Moreover, single-cell RNA sequencing showed profound transcriptomic variability in cancer cells at the single-cell level that predicted BCSC features. Notably, this transcriptomic variability was enriched during the transcription of 74 genes, revealed as BCSC markers. Breast cancer patients with a high risk of relapse exhibited higher expression levels of these BCSC markers than those with a low risk of relapse, thereby highlighting the clinical significance of predicting breast cancer prognosis with these BCSC markers.
conclusionsTranscriptomic variability, not genetic mutations, distinguishes BCSCs from non-BCSCs. The identified 74 BCSC markers have the potential of becoming novel targets for breast cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.