Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30231776›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2018

Characterization of Cell Membrane Permeability In Vitro Part II: Computational Model of Electroporation-Mediated Membrane Transport.

Daniel C Sweeney, Temple A Douglas, Rafael V Davalos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel C Sweeney1 Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1289-1627
Temple A Douglas1 Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Rafael V Davalos1 Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

High-frequency Irreversible Electroporation (H-FIRE) combinatorial GBM treatmentR01CA213423 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI DAVALOS, RAFAEL VIDAL, VERBRIDGE, SCOTT S · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Targeted electric field therapy for malignant infiltrative gliomaR21CA192042 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI DAVALOS, RAFAEL VIDAL, SANO, MICHAEL BENJAMIN · 2015 to 2016
$386k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA213423NCI NIH HHS R21 CA192042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroporation is the process by which applied electric fields generate nanoscale defects in biological membranes to more efficiently deliver drugs and other small molecules into the cells. Due to the complexity of the process, computational models of cellular electroporation are difficult to validate against quantitative molecular uptake data. In part I of this two-part report, we describe a novel method for quantitatively determining cell membrane permeability and molecular membrane transport using fluorescence microscopy. Here, in part II, we use the data from part I to develop a two-stage ordinary differential equation model of cellular electroporation. We fit our model using experimental data from cells immersed in three buffer solutions and exposed to electric field strengths of 170 to 400 kV/m and pulse durations of 1 to 1000 μs. We report that a low-conductivity 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1 piperazineethanesulfonic acid buffer enables molecular transport into the cell to increase more rapidly than with phosphate-buffered saline or culture medium-based buffer. For multipulse schemes, our model suggests that the interpulse delay between two opposite polarity electric field pulses does not play an appreciable role in the resultant molecular uptake for delays up to 100 μs. Our model also predicts the per-pulse permeability enhancement decreases as a function of the pulse number. This is the first report of an ordinary differential equation model of electroporation to be validated with quantitative molecular uptake data and consider both membrane permeability and charging.

Indexed as

Biological TransportCell MembraneCell Membrane PermeabilityComputer SimulationElectrochemotherapyElectroporationdifferential equationdiffusionpermeabilityporositypulsed electric fieldssolute

Identifiers

PMID30231776
PMCPMC6149036
OpenAlexW2892194894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.