Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30231773›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease2018

Long-term outcome of elderly out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors as compared with their younger counterparts and the general population.

Bart Hiemstra, Remco Bergman, Anthony R Absalom, Joukje van der Naalt, Pim van der Harst, Ronald de Vos, Wybe Nieuwland, Maarten W Nijsten, Iwan C C van der Horst

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. "Impact of age on management and prognosis of resuscitated sudden cardiac death patients".International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bart HiemstraDepartment of Critical Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30.001, Groningen, 9700 RB, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6547-2138
Remco BergmanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anthony R AbsalomUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7563-9157
Joukje van der NaaltUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pim van der HarstUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ronald de VosUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wybe NieuwlandUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maarten W NijstenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Iwan C C van der HorstUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background: Over the past decade, prehospital and in-hospital treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has improved considerably. There are sparse data on the long-term outcome, especially in elderly patients. We studied whether elderly patients benefit to the same extent compared with younger patients and at long-term follow up as compared with the general population.

methods: Between 2001 and 2010, data from all patients presented to our hospital after OHCA were recorded. Elderly patients (⩾75 years) were compared with younger patients. Neurological outcome was classified as cerebral performance category (CPC) at hospital discharge and long-term survival was compared with younger patients and predicted survival rates of the general population.

results: Of the 810 patients admitted after OHCA, a total of 551 patients (68%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation, including 125 (23%) elderly patients with a mean age of 81 ± 5 years. In-hospital survival was lower in elderly patients compared with younger patients with rates of 33% versus 57% ( p < 0.001). A CPC of 1 was present in 73% of the elderly patients versus 86% of the younger patients ( p = 0.031). In 7.3% of the elderly patients, a CPC >2 was observed versus 2.5% of their younger counterparts ( p = 0.103). Elderly patients had a median survival of 6.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-7.9] years compared with 7.7 (95% CI 7.5-7.9) years of the general population ( p = 0.019).

conclusions: The survival rate after OHCA in elderly patients is approximately half that of younger patients. Elderly patients who survive to discharge frequently have favorable neurological outcomes and a long-term survival that approximates that of the general population.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationSurvivorsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurologic ExaminationOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestPatient DischargeRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorscardiopulmonary resuscitationcerebral performanceelderlylong-term mortalityout-of-hospital cardiac arrestprognosis

Identifiers

PMID30231773
PMCPMC6266245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.