Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30231510›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2018

New Molecular Technologies for Minimal Residual Disease Evaluation in B-Cell Lymphoid Malignancies.

Irene Dogliotti, Daniela Drandi, Elisa Genuardi, Simone Ferrero

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene DogliottiHematology Division, Department of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10123 Torino, Italy. irenedogl@hotmail.com.
Daniela DrandiHematology Division, Department of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10123 Torino, Italy. daniela.drandi@unito.it.
Elisa GenuardiHematology Division, Department of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10123 Torino, Italy. elisa.genuardi@unito.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9624-0337
Simone FerreroHematology Division, Department of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10123 Torino, Italy. simone.ferrero@unito.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9711-1502
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clearance of malignant clonal cells significantly correlates with clinical outcomes in many hematologic malignancies. Accurate and high throughput tools for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection are needed to overcome some drawbacks of standard molecular techniques; such novel tools have allowed for higher sensitivity analyses and more precise stratification of patients, based on molecular response to therapy. In this review, we depict the recently introduced digital PCR and next-generation sequencing technologies, describing their current application for MRD monitoring in lymphoproliferative disorders. Moreover, we illustrate the feasibility of these new technologies to test less invasive and more patient-friendly tissues sources, such as "liquid biopsy".

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNAdroplet digital PCRleukemialymphomalymphoproliferative diseasesminimal residual diseasemyelomanext generation sequencingPCR

Identifiers

PMID30231510
PMCPMC6162632
OpenAlexW2889640611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.