Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30231062›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Bone remodeling: A tissue-level process emerging from cell-level molecular algorithms.

Clemente F Arias, Miguel A Herrero, Luis F Echeverri, Gerardo E Oleaga, José M López

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Lonafarnib clinical trials demonstrate uncoupling of the muscle-bone unit in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. High-molecular-weight Hyaluronan Administration Inhibits Bone Resorption and Promotes Bone Formation in Young-age Osteoporosis Rats.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Clemente F AriasGrupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complejos (GISC), Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4298-8910
Miguel A HerreroDepartamento de Análisis Matemático y Matemática Aplicada, Facultad de Matemáticas, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Luis F EcheverriInstituto de Matemáticas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Antioquia, 53108 Medellín, Colombia.
Gerardo E OleagaDepartamento de Análisis Matemático y Matemática Aplicada, Facultad de Matemáticas, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2815-8024
José M LópezDepartamento de Morfología y Biología Celular, Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0589-4763
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Antioquia · COUniversidad de Oviedo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human skeleton undergoes constant remodeling throughout the lifetime. Processes occurring on microscopic and molecular scales degrade bone and replace it with new, fully functional tissue. Multiple bone remodeling events occur simultaneously, continuously and independently throughout the body, so that the entire skeleton is completely renewed about every ten years.Bone remodeling is performed by groups of cells called Bone Multicellular Units (BMU). BMUs consist of different cell types, some specialized in the resorption of old bone, others encharged with producing new bone to replace the former. These processes are tightly regulated so that the amount of new bone produced is in perfect equilibrium with that of old bone removed, thus maintaining bone microscopic structure.To date, many regulatory molecules involved in bone remodeling have been identified, but the precise mechanism of BMU operation remains to be fully elucidated. Given the complexity of the signaling pathways already known, one may question whether such complexity is an inherent requirement of the process or whether some subset of the multiple constituents could fulfill the essential role, leaving functional redundancy to serve an alternative safety role. We propose in this work a minimal model of BMU function that involves a limited number of signals able to account for fully functional BMU operation. Our main assumptions were i) at any given time, any cell within a BMU can select only one among a limited choice of decisions, i.e. divide, die, migrate or differentiate, ii) this decision is irreversibly determined by depletion of an appropriate internal inhibitor and iii) the dynamics of any such inhibitor are coupled to that of specific external mediators, such as hormones, cytokines, growth factors. It was thus shown that efficient BMU operation manifests as an emergent process, which results from the individual and collective decisions taken by cells within the BMU unit in the absence of any external planning.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBone and BonesBone RemodelingCell LineageComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalOsteoclastsOsteocytes

Identifiers

PMID30231062
PMCPMC6145577
OpenAlexW2952472437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.