Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30231057›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Prediction of leprosy in the Chinese population based on a weighted genetic risk score.

Na Wang, Zhenzhen Wang, Chuan Wang, Xi'an Fu, Gongqi Yu, Zhenhua Yue, Tingting Liu, Huimin Zhang, Lulu Li, Mingfei Chen and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Na WangShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Zhenzhen WangShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Chuan WangShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xi'an FuShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Gongqi YuShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Zhenhua YueShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Tingting LiuShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Huimin ZhangShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Lulu LiShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Mingfei ChenShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Honglei WangShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Guiye NiuShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Dan LiuShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Mingkai ZhangShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yuanyuan XuShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yan ZhangShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jinghui LiShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Zhen LiShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jiabao YouShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Tongsheng ChuShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Furong LiShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Dianchang LiuShandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Hong LiuShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Furen ZhangShandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Diseases, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3383-1973
Shandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome wide association studies (GWASs) have revealed multiple genetic variants associated with leprosy in the Chinese population. The aim of our study was to utilize the genetic variants to construct a risk prediction model through a weighted genetic risk score (GRS) in a Chinese set and to further assess the performance of the model in identifying higher-risk contact individuals in an independent set. The highest prediction accuracy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.743 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.729-0.757), was achieved with a GRS encompassing 25 GWAS variants in a discovery set that included 2,144 people affected by leprosy and 2,671 controls. Individuals in the high-risk group, based on genetic factors (GRS > 28.06), have a 24.65 higher odds ratio (OR) for developing leprosy relative to those in the low-risk group (GRS≤18.17). The model was then applied to a validation set consisting of 1,385 people affected by leprosy and 7,541 individuals in contact with leprosy, which yielded a discriminatory ability with an AUC of 0.707 (95% CI: 0.691-0.723). When a GRS cut-off value of 22.38 was selected with the optimal sensitivity and specificity, it was found that 39.31% of high risk contact individuals should be screened in order to detect leprosy in 64.9% of those people affected by leprosy. In summary, we developed and validated a risk model for the prediction of leprosy that showed good discrimination capabilities, which may help physicians in the identification of patients coming into contact with leprosy and are at a higher-risk of developing this condition.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsian PeopleFemaleGenetic TestingHumansLeprosyMaleMiddle AgedModels, GeneticRisk AssessmentYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30231057
PMCPMC6166985
OpenAlexW2891515926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.