Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30231046›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Best practices for standardized performance testing of infrared thermographs intended for fever screening.

Pejman Ghassemi, T Joshua Pfefer, Jon P Casamento, Rob Simpson, Quanzeng Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An Overview of Thermal Infrared Imaging-Based Screenings during Pandemic Emergencies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Noncontact Sensing of Contagion.Journal of imaging · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pejman GhassemiCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
T Joshua PfeferCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Jon P CasamentoCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Rob SimpsonEngineering Measurement Division, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom.
Quanzeng WangCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0557-7058
United States Food and Drug Administration · USNational Physical Laboratory · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infrared (IR) modalities represent the only currently viable mass fever screening approaches for outbreaks of infectious disease pandemics such as Ebola virus disease and severe acute respiratory syndrome. Non-contact IR thermometers (NCITs) and IR thermographs (IRTs) have been used for fever screening in public areas such as airports. While NCITs remain a more popular choice than IRTs, there has been increasing evidences in the literature that IRTs can provide great accuracy in estimating body temperature if qualified systems are used and appropriate procedures are consistently applied. In this study, we addressed the issue of IRT qualification by implementing and evaluating a battery of test methods for objective, quantitative assessment of IRT performance based on a recent international standard (IEC 80601-2-59). We tested two commercial IRTs to evaluate their stability and drift, image uniformity, minimum resolvable temperature difference, and radiometric temperature laboratory accuracy. Based on these tests, we illustrated how experimental and data processing procedures could affect results, and suggested methods for clarifying and optimizing test methods. Overall, the insights into thermograph standardization and acquisition methods provided by this study may improve the utility of IR thermography and aid in comparing IRT performance, thus improving the potential for producing high quality disease pandemic countermeasures.

Indexed as

AirportsCommunicable DiseasesDisease OutbreaksFeverHumansInfrared RaysMass ScreeningPractice Guidelines as TopicThermographyThermometers

Identifiers

PMID30231046
PMCPMC6145558
OpenAlexW2890786165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.