Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30231022›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Forecasting the global demand for HIV monitoring and diagnostic tests: A 2016-2021 analysis.

V Habiyambere, B Dongmo Nguimfack, L Vojnov, N Ford, J Stover, L Hasek, P Maggiore, D Low-Beer, M Pérez Gonzàlez, D Edgil and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. The Future of HIV: Challenges in meeting the 2030medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. "Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

V HabiyambereDepartment of HIV/AIDS, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
B Dongmo NguimfackDepartment of HIV/AIDS, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
L VojnovDepartment of HIV/AIDS, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
N FordDepartment of HIV/AIDS, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
J StoverAvenir Health, Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States of America.
L HasekCHAI, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
P MaggioreCHAI, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
D Low-BeerDepartment of HIV/AIDS, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
M Pérez GonzàlezDepartment of HIV/AIDS, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
D EdgilUSAID, Washington DC, United States of America.
J WilliamsUS CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
J KuritskyUSAID, Washington DC, United States of America.
S HargreavesInternational Health Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2974-4348
T NeSmithUS CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

Funding

PEPFARWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite considerable progress, just over half of the 37 million people eligible to start antiretroviral therapy (ART) have accessed treatment and millions of HIV-positive people still do not know their status. With demand for ART continuing to grow, meeting the ambitious 90-90-90 HIV treatment targets will depend on improved access to high-quality diagnostics to both diagnose infection and monitor treatment adherence in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Robust projections of future demand for CD4, viral load (VL), HIV early-infant-diagnosis (EID) tests and HIV rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are needed as scale-up continues.

methodsWe estimate the current coverage for HIV diagnostics and project future demand to 2021 using a consolidated forecast using data on past coverage and current demand from a number of sources, from 130 predominantly LMIC countries.

resultsWe forecast that the overall number of CD4 tests is expected to decline between now and 2021 as more countries adopt test-and-treat and shift to VL testing for patient monitoring. Our consolidated forecast projects a gradual decline in demand for CD4 tests to 16.6 million by 2021. We anticipate that demand for VL tests will increase to 28.5 million by 2021, reflecting the increasing number of people who will receive ART and the adoption of VL testing for patient monitoring. We expect that the demand for EID tests will grow more rapidly than in past years, driven by the implementation of testing at birth in programmes globally, in line with WHO guideline recommendations, doubling to 2.1 million tests by 2021. Demand for rapid diagnostic tests is also likely to increase, reaching 509 million tests by 2021. DISCUSSION: In order to achieve the ambitious 90-90-90 targets, it will be essential to maintain and improve access to CD4, VL, EID tests and RDTs. These projections provide insight into the global demand we can expect to see for these HIV monitoring and diagnostic tests, both in relation to historical trends, and the 90-90-90 targets. Our projections will better enable producers to ensure adequate supply, and to support procurement organisations in planning future funding and purchase plans to meet the anticipated demand. The findings highlight the ongoing need for governments and international funding bodies to prioritise improving capacity and access to HIV diagnostic and monitoring technologies in line with demand.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualForecastingHIV-1HIV InfectionsModels, BiologicalAnti-Retroviral AgentsEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID30231022
PMCPMC6145505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.