Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30231021›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

Balancing selection on a recessive lethal deletion with pleiotropic effects on two neighboring genes in the porcine genome.

Martijn F L Derks, Marcos S Lopes, Mirte Bosse, Ole Madsen, Bert Dibbits, Barbara Harlizius, Martien A M Groenen, Hendrik-Jan Megens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel genotyping assay for a 212-kb deletion from theJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. AgAnimalGenomes: browsers for viewing and manually annotating farm animal genomes.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martijn F L DerksWageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1317-5654
Marcos S LopesTopigs Norsvin Research Center, Beuningen, the Netherlands.
Mirte BosseWageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ole MadsenWageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Bert DibbitsWageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Barbara HarliziusTopigs Norsvin Research Center, Beuningen, the Netherlands.
Martien A M GroenenWageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Hendrik-Jan MegensWageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3619-7533
Wageningen University & Research · NLTopigs Norsvin (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock populations can be used to study recessive defects caused by deleterious alleles. The frequency of deleterious alleles including recessive lethal alleles can stay at high or moderate frequency within a population, especially if recessive lethal alleles exhibit an advantage for favourable traits in heterozygotes. In this study, we report such a recessive lethal deletion of 212kb (del) within the BBS9 gene in a breeding population of pigs. The deletion produces a truncated BBS9 protein expected to cause a complete loss-of-function, and we find a reduction of approximately 20% on the total number of piglets born from carrier by carrier matings. Homozygous del/del animals die mid- to late-gestation, as observed from high increase in numbers of mummified piglets resulting from carrier-by-carrier crosses. The moderate 10.8% carrier frequency (5.4% allele frequency) in this pig population suggests an advantage on a favourable trait in heterozygotes. Indeed, heterozygous carriers exhibit increased growth rate, an important selection trait in pig breeding. Increased growth and appetite together with a lower birth weight for carriers of the BBS9 null allele in pigs is analogous to the phenotype described in human and mouse for (naturally occurring) BBS9 null-mutants. We show that fetal death, however, is induced by reduced expression of the downstream BMPER gene, an essential gene for normal foetal development. In conclusion, this study describes a lethal 212kb deletion with pleiotropic effects on two different genes, one resulting in fetal death in homozygous state (BMPER), and the other increasing growth (BBS9) in heterozygous state. We provide strong evidence for balancing selection resulting in an unexpected high frequency of a lethal allele in the population. This study shows that the large amounts of genomic and phenotypic data routinely generated in modern commercial breeding programs deliver a powerful tool to monitor and control lethal alleles much more efficiently.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene FrequencyInbreedingAnimalsDatasets as TopicFemaleFertilityGenes, LethalGenes, RecessiveGenotyping TechniquesHeterozygoteHomozygoteMaleModels, AnimalSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID30231021
PMCPMC6166978
OpenAlexW2889681800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.