ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2018
Peptide and Protein Structure Prediction with a Simplified Continuum Solvent Model.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modulation of free energy landscapes as a strategy for the design of antimicrobial peptides.Journal of biological physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
A continuum solvent model based on screened Coulomb potentials has been simplified and parametrized to sample native-like structures in replica-exchange simulations of each of six different peptides and miniproteins. Low-energy, native, and non-native structures were used to iteratively refine 11 parameter values. The centroid of the largest cluster of structures sampled in simulations initiated from an extended conformation represents the predicted structure. The main-chain rms deviation of this prediction from the experimental structure was 0.47 Å for the 12-residue Trp-zip2, 0.86 Å for the 14-residue MBH12, 2.53 Å for the 17-residue U(1-17)T9D, 2.03 Å for the 20-residue BS1, 1.08 Å for the 20-residue Trp-cage, and 3.64 Å for the 35-residue villin headpiece subdomain HP35. The centroid of the sixth largest cluster sampled for HP35 deviated by 0.91 Å. The CHARMM22/CMAP force field was used, with an additional ψ torsion term for residues other than glycine and proline. Six parameters govern the dielectric response of the continuum solvent, and four values of surface tension approximate nonpolar effects. An atom's self-energy and interaction energies are screened independently, each depending on whether the atom is part of a charged group, a neutral hydrogen-bonding main-chain group, or any other neutral group. The parameters inferred result in strong main-chain hydrogen bonds, consistent with the view that protein folding is dominated by the formation of these bonds. (1,2) Conformations of MBH12 and BS1 were excluded from the energy-function refinement, suggesting the parameters, referred to as SCP18, are transferable. An efficient estimate of solvent-accessible surface area is also described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.