Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30230699›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

The efficacy and safety of ALK inhibitors in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis.

Junsheng Fan, Tszhei Fong, Zengfei Xia, Jian Zhang, Peng Luo

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Junsheng FanDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5143-2968
Tszhei FongDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zengfei XiaDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7217-0111
Peng LuoDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8215-2045
Zhujiang Hospital · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current study was carried out to compare the effectiveness and safety of different ALK inhibitors in treating ALK+ NSCLC.

methodsProgression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall response rate (ORR), and intracranial ORR and DCR have been aggregated to appraise the effectiveness of each ALKi. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events (AEs) was pooled to evaluate their safety. Bayesian network meta-analyses were used to compare the ORR, DCR, PFS, and discontinuation rate of patients treated with alectinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, and chemotherapy.

resultsCompared with chemotherapy, ALK inhibitors significantly prolonged PFS [hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI): alectinib, 0.50 (0.43-0.58); ceritinib, 0.75 (0.69-0.83); crizotinib, 0.71 (0.66-0.76)]. The ORRs were significantly higher for ALK inhibitors than for chemotherapy [odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% CI: alectinib, 11.69 (4.29-36.56); ceritinib, 7.85 (3.44-19.27); crizotinib, 6.04 (3.33-11.71)]. The discontinuation rates were lower for ALK inhibitors than for chemotherapy [OR and corresponding 95% CI: alectinib, 0.42 (0.12-1.36); ceritinib, 0.52 (0.20-1.35); crizotinib, 0.70 (0.30-1.62)].

conclusionsALK+ NSCLC patients treated with ALKi tend to have longer PFS than those treated with chemotherapy. ALKi-naïve patients tended to response better than their ALKi-pretreated counterparts. Alectinib appeared to be preferable for treating brain metastases due to its high intracranial efficacy. Patients treated with alectinib or ceritinib tended to have higher ORR and DCR than patients with similar baselines treated with crizotinib or chemotherapy. No significant differences in discontinuation rate were found for alectinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, and chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Anaplastic Lymphoma KinaseBayes TheoremCarbazolesCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCrizotinibFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesSulfonesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomealectinibALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCarbazolesceritinibCrizotinibPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesSulfonesanaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor (ALKi)brain metastasisnetwork meta-analysisnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Identifiers

PMID30230699
PMCPMC6198244
OpenAlexW2891551818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.