ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2019
Antibacterial 3D bone scaffolds for tissue engineering application.
Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances on Starch-Based Biomaterials: A Review.ACS polymers Au · 2026Review
- Nitric Oxide: Physiological Functions, Delivery, and Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Scaffolds in the microbial resistant era: Fabrication, materials, properties and tissue engineering applications.Materials today. Bio · 2022Review
- Therapeutic Delivery of Nitric Oxide Utilizing Saccharide-Based Materials.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2021Review
- Nanomaterial Nitric Oxide Delivery in Traumatic Orthopedic Regenerative Medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Antibacterial and Cellular Response Toward a Gasotransmitter-Based Hybrid Wound Dressing.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Open bone fractures are not only difficult to heal but also are at a high risk of infections. Annual cases of fractures which result from osteoporosis amount to approximately 9 million. Endogenously released nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to play a role in osteogenic differentiation in addition to eradicating infection against a wide variety of pathogens. In the current work, antimicrobial NO releasing 3D bone scaffolds were fabricated using S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine (SNAP) as the NO donor. During fabrication, nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) was added to each of the scaffolds in the concentration range of 10-50 wt % in nHA-starch-alginate and nHA-starch-chitosan scaffolds. The mechanical strength of the scaffolds increased proportionally to the concentration of nHA and 50 wt % nHA-starch-alginate possessed the highest load bearing capacity of 203.95 ± 0.3 N. The NO flux of the 50 wt % nHA-starch-alginate scaffolds was found to be 0.50 ± 0.06 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.