ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2018
Comparison of three commercial multiplex PCR assays for the diagnosis of intestinal protozoa.
Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of ARK Checker® C/G-DyLight® 488: simultaneous detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium by fluorescent antibody microscopy.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Next-Gen intestinal parasite detection: Leveraging metataxonomics for improved diagnosis of intestinal protists and helminths.PloS one · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Allplex™ GI-Parasite Assay-A Multiplex Real Time PCR for the Diagnosis of Intestinal Protozoa: A Multicentric Italian Study.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of commercial and "In-House" molecular tests for the detection of intestinal protozoa in stool samples.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Improvement of the diagnosis of intestinal protozoa using a multiplex qPCR strategy compared to classical microscopy: a prospective study on 3,500 stool samples over 3 years.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Cryptosporidiosis: A global threat to human and animal health.Open veterinary journal · 2025Review
- Comparison of four diagnostic techniques forQatar medical journal · 2025Article
- Cryptosporidium species and subtypes identified in human domestic cases through the national microbiological surveillance programme in Sweden from 2018 to 2022.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Commercial Concentration Methods for Microscopic Diagnosis of Protozoa and Helminths in Human Stool Samples in a Non-Endemic Area.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Article
- Selecting a multiplex PCR panel for accurate molecular diagnosis of intestinal protists: a comparative study of AllplexParasite (Paris, France) · 2022Article
- Commercial Simplex and Multiplex PCR Assays for the Detection of Intestinal ParasitesMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Comparative Performance of Eight PCR Methods to DetectPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- High Diversity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comparative Study of Eleven Mechanical Pretreatment Protocols forMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the Allplex™ GI-Helminth(I) Assay, the first marketed multiplex PCR for helminth diagnosis.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2021Article
- Multicenter Comparative Study of SixMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Evaluation of the AllplexMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Cryptosporidiosis after treatment with fingolimod: a case report and pharmacovigilance review.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Review
- Update on Cryptosporidium spp.: highlights from the Seventh International Giardia and Cryptosporidium Conference.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although microscopic examination of stool samples remains the reference method for the diagnosis of intestinal protozoal infections, these techniques are time-consuming and require operators who are experienced and well trained. Molecular biology seems to offer performances at least equivalent in terms of sensitivity and specificity for certain parasites. This study aimed to compare three multiplex PCR assays on 93 prospectively collected positive stools (prospective cohort) and a panel of 12 more Cryptosporidium-positive samples (Cryptosporidium panel). On the prospective cohort, the sensitivity was 89%, 64% and 41% for Giardia sp. detection for BD Max
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.