Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30230318›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2018

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of High and Low Doses of the Herbicide Propanil in Mice.

Rosana Schafer, Ted J Ognibene, Michael A Malfatti, Kenneth W Turteltaub, John B Barnett

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HPLC-Parallel accelerator and molecular mass spectrometry analysis ofJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosana SchaferDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cell Biology , West Virginia University , Morgantown , West Virginia 26506-9177 , United States.
Ted J OgnibeneCenter for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry , Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory , Livermore , California 94551-0808 , United States.
Michael A MalfattiCenter for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry , Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory , Livermore , California 94551-0808 , United States.
Kenneth W TurteltaubCenter for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry , Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory , Livermore , California 94551-0808 , United States.
John B BarnettDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cell Biology , West Virginia University , Morgantown , West Virginia 26506-9177 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6547-2381
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Resource for the Development of Biomedical Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS)P41GM103483 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRNC LVRMR NAT LAB · PI TURTELTAUB, KENNETH W. · 2012 to 2019
$12.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have documented that the herbicide propanil is immunotoxic in mice, and our in vitro tissue culture experiments largely recapitulate the in vivo studies. Laboratory studies on environmental contaminants are the most meaningful when these studies are conducted using concentrations that approximate levels in the environment. Many techniques to measure the distribution and pharmacokinetics (PK) on compounds rely on techniques, such as liquid scintillation counting (LSC) of radio-labeled starting compound, that require concentrations higher than environmental levels. The aim of this study was to compare tissue PK after exposure to propanil concentrations more relevant to levels of exposure to agricultural workers and the general population to concentrations previously reported for laboratory studies. To this end, we conducted a study to measure propanil distribution in three immune organs, using ultrasensitive accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). We used two doses: the lower dose modeled levels expected in the environment or long-term occupational exposure to low doses, while the higher dose was to model the effects of an accidental exposure. Our results showed that the distribution and PK profiles from these two different concentrations was markedly different. The profile of the high dose (concentration) exposure was indicative of saturation of the detoxifying capability of the animal. In contrast, at the lower environmentally relevant concentration, in vivo concentrations of propanil in spleen, liver, and blood dropped to a very low level by 720 min. In conclusion, these studies highlight the differences in PK of propanil at these two doses, which suggests that the toxicity of this chemical should be re-investigated to obtain better data on toxic effects at doses relevant for humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbon RadioisotopesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHalf-LifeHerbicidesLiverMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPropanilSpleenCarbon-14Carbon RadioisotopesHerbicidesPropanil

Identifiers

PMID30230318
PMCPMC6407418
OpenAlexW2891027462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.