Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30230257›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacology in drug development2019

Relative and Absolute Bioavailability Study of Emicizumab to Bridge Drug Products and Subcutaneous Injection Sites in Healthy Volunteers.

Naoki Kotani, Koichiro Yoneyama, Nobuhiko Kawakami, Tohru Shimuta, Hiroyuki Fukase, Takehiko Kawanishi

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Emicizumab state-of-the-art update.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Naoki KotaniChugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichiro YoneyamaChugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuhiko KawakamiChugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Tohru ShimutaChugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki FukaseCPC Clinic, Medipolis Medical Research Institute, Kagoshima, Japan.
Takehiko KawanishiChugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Chugai Pharma (United States) · USMedipolis Medical Research Institute · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emicizumab (ACE910) is a bispecific antibody that is a novel, subcutaneously injectable treatment for patients with hemophilia A. This study assessed the relative bioavailability of emicizumab between old and new drug products (DPs) and among 3 commonly used subcutaneous injection sites (abdomen, upper arm, and thigh), together with its absolute bioavailability in healthy volunteers. Forty-eight healthy volunteers were randomized into 4 groups to receive a single subcutaneous injection of 1 mg/kg with the old or new DP, and another 12 volunteers each received a single, 90-minute, intravenous infusion of 0.25 mg/kg with the new DP. Similar pharmacokinetic profiles were observed between the DPs, with geometric mean ratios of 1.199 (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.060-1.355) for the maximum plasma concentration and 1.083 (90% CI 0.920-1.275) for area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity. The geometric mean ratios of maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity for upper arm versus abdomen were 0.823 (90% CI 0.718-0.943) and 0.926 (90% CI 0.814-1.053), respectively, and those for thigh versus abdomen were 1.168 (90% CI 1.030-1.324) and 1.073 (90% CI 0.969-1.189), respectively. Absolute bioavailability ranged from 80.4% to 93.1%. These results suggested that no emicizumab dose adjustment would be needed when switching the DPs or injecting to different sites interchangeably and that emicizumab injected subcutaneously is highly bioavailable.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, BispecificAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiological AvailabilityDrug CompoundingHealthy VolunteersHumansInjection Site ReactionInjections, SubcutaneousJapanMaleYoung AdultAntibodies, BispecificAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedemicizumabbioavailabilitydrug product bridging strategyemicizumabhemophilia Amonoclonal antibody

Identifiers

PMID30230257
PMCPMC6767117
OpenAlexW2890442696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.