Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30230062›Full record

ArticleMycoses2019

The epidemiology of non-Candida yeast isolated from blood: The Asia Surveillance Study.

Shang-Yi Lin, Po-Liang Lu, Ban Hock Tan, Arunaloke Chakrabarti, Un-In Wu, Jui-Hsuan Yang, Atul K Patel, Ruo Yu Li, Siriorn P Watcharananan, Zhengyin Liu and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycoses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. BeyondJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rare Yeasts in Latin America: Uncommon Yet Meaningful.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Persistence of an epidemic cluster ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Shang-Yi LinDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-4077
Po-Liang LuDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7423-6783
Ban Hock TanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore.
Arunaloke ChakrabartiDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1555-3807
Un-In WuDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jui-Hsuan YangDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Atul K PatelDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Sterling Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6575-2460
Ruo Yu LiDepartment of Dermatology, Peking University First Hospital, Research Center for Medical Mycology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Siriorn P WatcharanananDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Zhengyin LiuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ariya ChindampornDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ai Ling TanDepartment of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore.
Pei-Lun SunDepartment of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Li-Yin HsuDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yee-Chun ChenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1816-9010
Asia Fungal Working Group (AFWG)
Kaohsiung Medical University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWSingapore General Hospital · SGChang Gung University · TWChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNChulalongkorn University · THNational Health Research Institutes · TWNational Taiwan University · TWPeking University · CNPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INRamathibodi Hospital · THSterling Hospitals · IN

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan NSC 102-2314-B-002 -158 -MY3Pfizer 201108019RC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend echinocandins as first-line therapy for candidemia. However, several non-Candida yeast are non-susceptible to echinocandins (echinocandin non-susceptible yeast, ENSY), including Cryptococcus, Geotrichum, Malassezia, Pseudozyma, Rhodotorula, Saprochaete, Sporobolomyces and Trichosporon. In laboratories that are not equipped with rapid diagnostic tools, it often takes several days to identify yeast, and this may lead to inappropriate presumptive use of echinocandins in patients with ENSY fungemia. The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of ENSY species during a 1-year, laboratory surveillance programme in Asia.

methodsNon-duplicate yeast isolated from blood or bone marrow cultures at 25 hospitals in China, Hong Kong, India, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand were analysed. Isolates were considered to be duplicative if they were obtained within 7 days from the same patient.

resultsOf 2155 yeast isolates evaluated, 175 (8.1%) were non-Candida yeast. The majority of non-Candida yeast were ENSY (146/175, 83.4%). These included Cryptococcus (109 isolates), Trichosporon (23), Rhodotorula (10) and Malassezia (4). The proportion of ENSY isolates (146/2155, 6.7%) differed between tropical (India, Thailand and Singapore; 51/593, 8.6%) and non-tropical countries/regions (China, Hong Kong and Taiwan; 95/1562, 6.1%, P = 0.038). ENSY was common in outpatient clinics (25.0%) and emergency departments (17.8%) but rare in intensive care units (4.7%) and in haematology-oncology units (2.9%). Cryptococcus accounted for the majority of the non-Candida species in emergency departments (21/24, 87.5%) and outpatient clinics (4/5, 80.0%).

conclusionsIsolation of non-Candida yeast from blood cultures was not rare, and the frequency varied among medical units and countries.

Indexed as

AsiaBloodBone MarrowCross-Sectional StudiesEpidemiological MonitoringFungemiaHospitalsHumansPrevalenceYeastscandidemiaechinocandinfungemiapresumptive therapyyeast

Identifiers

PMID30230062
PMCPMC7379604
OpenAlexW2891857259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.