Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30229528›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

Improved specificity with

Peter Donato, Matthew J Roberts, Andrew Morton, Samuel Kyle, Geoff Coughlin, Rachel Esler, Nigel Dunglison, Robert A Gardiner, John Yaxley

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy with and without PSMA-PET-Targeted Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  7. Head-to-Head Comparison ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pathological and radiological features of false-positive lesions on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Diagnostic value ofCancer biology & therapy · 2024
    Article
  16. The value ofDiscover oncology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter DonatoDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, 4006, Australia.
Matthew J RobertsDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, 4006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0552-7402
Andrew MortonThe University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia.
Samuel KyleThe University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia.
Geoff CoughlinDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, 4006, Australia.
Rachel EslerDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, 4006, Australia.
Nigel DunglisonDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, 4006, Australia.
Robert A GardinerDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, 4006, Australia.
John YaxleyDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, 4006, Australia. john@wesleyurologyclinic.com.au.
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUGriffith University · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePositron emission tomography (PET) for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) represents a promising method for prostate cancer diagnosis and staging. Comparisons of PSMA-based tumour characterisation to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) are limited, hence this study sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of

methodsA retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pre-operative mpMRI and

resultsFifty-eight patients (median age 65.5 years, median PSA 7.35 ng/mL) underwent RP, resulting in a high-risk cohort (≥pT3 69%). Sensitivities for identification of index lesion, bilateral and multifocal disease were 90%, 21%, 19% for mpMRI and 93%, 42%, 34% for

conclusions

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingOligopeptidesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatectomyAgedEdetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptidesGlutamate carboxypeptidase II, humanMagnetic resonance imagingPositron-emission tomographyProstatectomy,Prostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30229528
OpenAlexW2890919948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.