Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30229467›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2018

A review of heavy metal cation binding to deoxyribonucleic acids for the creation of chemical sensors.

Vangelis George Kanellis, Cristobal G Dos Remedios

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Do Ternary DNA-Cr(III)-Small Molecule Adducts Form?Biological trace element research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. How Divalent Cations Interact with the Internal Channel Site of Guanine Quadruplexes.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vangelis George KanellisThe Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia. vangeliskanellis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-8949
Cristobal G Dos RemediosThe University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Canberra Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various human activities lead to the pollution of ground, drinking, and wastewater with toxic metals. It is well known that metal ions preferentially bind to DNA phosphate backbones or DNA nucleobases, or both. Foreman et al. (Environ Toxicol Chem 30(8):1810-1818, 2011) reported the use of a DNA-dye based assay suitable for use as a toxicity test for potable environmental water. They compared the results of this test with the responses of live-organism bioassays. The DNA-based demonstrated that the loss of SYBR Green I fluorescence dye bound to calf thymus DNA was proportional to the toxicity of the water sample. However, this report raised questions about the mechanism that formed the basis of this quasi-quantitatively test. In this review, we identify the unique and preferred DNA-binding sites of individual metals. We show how highly sensitive and selective DNA-based sensors can be designed that contain multiple binding sites for 21 heavy metal cations that bind to DNA and change its structure, consistent with the release of the DNA-bound dye.

Indexed as

BindingDNAHeavy metalsToxicityWater

Identifiers

PMID30229467
PMCPMC6233346
OpenAlexW2891569441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.