Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30229444›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2019

Electronic referrals for virtual fracture clinic service using the National Integrated Medical Imaging System (NIMIS).

Oisin Breathnach, Marc O'Reilly, Keith Morrissey, Breda Conlon, Eoin Sheehan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Direct discharge of patients with simple stable musculoskeletal injuries as an alternative to routine follow-up: a systematic review of the current literature.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The impact of digitisation of a virtual fracture clinic on referral quality, outcomes and assessment times.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oisin BreathnachTullamore Regional Hospital, Tullamore, Ireland. opbreathnach@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5261-2971
Marc O'ReillyTullamore Regional Hospital, Tullamore, Ireland.
Keith MorrisseyNational Integrated Medical Imaging System (NIMIS), Dublin, Ireland.
Breda ConlonTullamore Regional Hospital, Tullamore, Ireland.
Eoin SheehanTullamore Regional Hospital, Tullamore, Ireland.
Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVirtual fracture clinics (VFC) are now prevalent across many orthopaedic services in the UK and Ireland. The management of a variety of musculoskeletal injuries using the VFC model has been demonstrated to be safe, cost-effective and associated with high levels of patient satisfaction. Referrals were made available through the National Integrated Medical Imaging System (NIMIS). NIMIS allows for electronic movement of patient images throughout the Irish health service.

methodsA retrospective review of 157 orthopaedic fracture referrals from a regional hospital was performed. The referrals were received during a 6-week period between May 2016 and June 2016. Each of these referrals was sent electronically. These referrals were reviewed each day by a consultant-led multi-disciplinary team.

resultsThirty (93%) patients agreed or strongly agreed that they received adequate information in relation to the VFC when they attended the emergency department (ED). All patients except for one either agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their recovery (97%). Fifteen parents advised us that they would have had to take time off to attend fracture clinic with their child. Two patients attended their general practitioner (GP) or ED to seek further pain relief following their injuries. Only one patient reported a poor clinical outcome. Nine (28%) patients reported that they would have preferred a face-to-face appointment rather than being treated by the VFC.

conclusionVirtual review of orthopaedic trauma patients results in satisfactory patient outcomes. Clinical outcomes were acceptable with minimal additional medical attention required following injury. Electronic transfer of information allows for the virtual service to operate from sites long distances from the primary orthopaedic centre. The NIMIS is a safe and confidential means of collaborating with other institutions and has huge potential in the areas of trauma care delivery, clinical conferencing and other image-based disciplines.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesDiagnostic ImagingFemaleFractures, BoneHumansIrelandMaleReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesElectronic referralsNational Integrated Medical Imaging SystemNIMISPatient safetyVirtual fracture clinic

Identifiers

PMID30229444
OpenAlexW2892045927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.