ArticleWorld journal of surgery2019
Surgical and Long-Term Survival Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisiting lymph node guidelines: limited lymph node examination might be sufficient for elderly gastric cancer patients.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Review
- Analysis of risk factors affecting long-term survival in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- Impact of preoperative therapy on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- A case series of 10 patients undergone linear cutter/stapler guiding device-led overlapped esophagojejunostomy: a preliminary study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Esophago-jejunal Anastomosis During Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in 72 Patients: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Comparison of laparoscopic surgery with open standard surgery for advanced gastric carcinoma in a single institute: a propensity score matching analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Incidence and risk factors of postoperative complications after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an analysis of 817 cases based on 10-year experience in a large-scale center.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Could neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase postoperative complication risk of laparoscopic total gastrectomy? A mono-institutional propensity score-matched study in China.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
- Totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy using the modified overlap method and conventional open total gastrectomy: A comparative study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study in China.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Effect Of Surgical Safety Checklists On Gastric Cancer Outcomes: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Cancer management and research · 2019Article
- Short- and Long-term Outcomes After LaparoscopicCancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo compare the surgical and long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy (OTG) for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 308 and 900 patients in pathological locally AGC who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) or OTG between June 2008 and December 2014. We compared surgical and long-term outcomes between the two groups using propensity score matching method.
resultsThe LTG group showed a longer operation time (261.42 vs. 171.00 min, P = 0.001), less blood loss (185.47 vs. 217.84 ml, P = 0.000), earlier time to first flatus (3.47 vs. 4.12 days, P = 0.000), earlier time to start liquid diet (3.76 vs. 4.27 days, P = 0.000), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.56 vs. 8.22 days, P = 0.007). The overall complication rate was 15.2% in the LTG group and 17.2% in the OTG (P = 0.503). No significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between LTG and OTG (60.5% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.337; 57.4% vs. 54.4%, P = 0.341).
conclusionsCompared to OTG, LTG provides surgical benefits and comparable survival outcomes for patients with locally AGC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.