Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30229378›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2018

Will Genetic Engineering Carry Xenotransplantation of Pig Islets to the Clinic?

Elisabeth Kemter, Joachim Denner, Eckhard Wolf

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pigs with anFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Current status of porcine islet xenotransplantation.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Genetically modified pigs as donors of cells, tissues, and organs for xenotransplantation.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth KemterGene Center, and Center for Innovative Medical Models (CiMM), LMU Munich, Feodor-Lynen-Str. 25, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Joachim DennerRobert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Eckhard WolfGene Center, and Center for Innovative Medical Models (CiMM), LMU Munich, Feodor-Lynen-Str. 25, 81377, Munich, Germany. ewolf@genzentrum.lmu.de.
Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DERobert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPorcine islets represent a potentially attractive beta-cell source for xenotransplantation into patients with type 1 diabetes, who are not eligible to islet allo-transplantation due to a lack of suitable human donor organs. Recent progress in genetic engineering/gene editing of donor pigs provides new opportunities to overcome rejection of xeno-islets, to improve their engraftment and insulin secretion capacity, and to reduce the risk for transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses. This review summarizes the current issues and progress in islet xenotransplantation with special emphasis on genetically modified/gene edited donor pigs. RECENT

findingsAttempts to overcome acute rejection of xeno-islets, especially after intraportal transplantation into the liver, include the genetic elimination of specific carbohydrate antigens such as αGal, Neu5Gc, and Sd(a) for which humans and-in part-non-human primates have natural antibodies that bind to these targets leading to activation of complement and coagulation. A complementary approach is the expression of one or more human complement regulatory proteins (hCD46, hCD55, hCD59). Transgenic attempts to overcome cellular rejection of islet xenotransplants include the expression of proteins that inhibit co-stimulation of T cells. Expression of glucagon-like peptide-1 and M3 muscarinic receptors has been shown to increase the insulin secretion of virally transduced porcine islets in vitro and it will be interesting to see the effects of these modifications in transgenic pigs and islet products derived from them. Genome-wide inactivation of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) integrants by mutating their pol genes using CRISPR/Cas9 is a recent approach to reduce the risk for PERV transmission by xeno-islets. Genetic engineering/gene editing of xeno-islet donor pigs facilitated major progress towards clinical islet xenotransplantation. The required set of genetic modifications will depend on the source of islets (fetal/neonatal vs. adult), the mode of delivery (encapsulated vs. free), and the transplantation site.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringIslets of Langerhans TransplantationTranslational Research, BiomedicalTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsGene EditingHumansZoonosesGene editingIslet transplantationPigXenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID30229378
OpenAlexW2891144251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.