ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2018
Issues in Defining the Burden of Prediabetes Globally.
Review in Current diabetes reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The burden of prediabetes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Supporting change in a complex reality: a qualitative study of specialist nurses' perceptions of counselling patients at risk of type 2 diabetes.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Food as both comfort and risk: perspectives on healthy eating among Swedish women with prediabetes.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of ischemia-modified albumin in diabetes mellitus.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Prediabetes in children and adolescents: An updated review.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2023Review
- Data-driven subgroups of prediabetes and the associations with outcomes in Chinese adults.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Article
- Hemoglobin A1c in combination with fasting plasma glucose trumps fasting plasma glucose alone as predictive indicators for diabetes mellitus: an ambidirectional cohort study of Thai people with impaired fasting glucose.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2021Article
- A Narrative Review of Human Clinical Trials on the Impact of Phenolic-Rich Plant Extracts on Prediabetes and Its Subgroups.Nutrients · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewUsing a global perspective, this review collates evidence on the heterogeneity of prediabetes definitions and diagnostic methods, their clinical and public health implications, and discusses possible options for improvement. RECENT
findingsOur review notes that the concept of prediabetes is increasingly recognized worldwide, but against a background of non-uniform definition and diagnostic criteria. This results in widely varying burden estimation. Current evidence shows a variety of prediabetes phenotypes. This reflects biological and diagnostic heterogeneity, resulting from the use of different tests (glucose or HbA
Indexed as
Identifiers
30229351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.