Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30229307›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2019

Deficits in auditory sensory discrimination among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Yi-Min Tien, Vincent Chin-Hung Chen, Tun-Shin Lo, Chia-Fen Hsu, Michael Gossop, Kuo-You Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Application of Preschool Auditory Processing Assessment Scale in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yi-Min TienDepartment of Psychology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Vincent Chin-Hung ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Tun-Shin LoDepartment of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd, Taichung, 40201, Taiwan.
Chia-Fen HsuDepartment of Psychology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Michael GossopNational Addiction Centre, King's College, London, UK.
Kuo-You HuangDepartment of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec. 1, Jianguo N. Rd, Taichung, 40201, Taiwan. kyhuang3317@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7391-4933
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWKing's College London · GB

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 105-2314-B-182-028Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan NSC 102-2314-B-040-004-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research into children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has focused on complex cognitive dysfunction, but less attention has been paid to sensory perception processes underlying the symptoms of ADHD. Based on signal detection theory, the present study compared the sensory discrimination ability and decision bias of children with and without ADHD. It also investigated the differences between ADHD with predominantly inattentive (ADHDi) and combined presentations (ADHDc). The sample of 75 children and adolescents with ADHD (24 ADHDi, 51 ADHDc) (16 females and 59 males) and 22 typical developing controls (TD) (8 females and 14 males) completed an auditory signal detection task. Participants were asked to detect signals against levels of transient background noise (35, 45, 55, and 65 dB). The results showed that with the increase of noise levels, both the ADHD and TD groups demonstrated decreased sensory discrimination. Although both groups successfully detected signal against noise levels from 35 to 55 dB, the ADHD group showed lower discrimination ability than that of the TD group. For decision bias, no group difference was found. Further comparisons regarding the predominant symptom presentation of ADHD sub-groups showed no differences. Current research has suggested that the deficit in ADHD people's signal detection performance can be attributed to sensory discrimination rather than decision bias. We suggest that background noise should be taken into account when using auditory stimuli to investigate cognitive functions in people with ADHD.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAuditory Perceptual DisordersChildFemaleHumansMaleADHDAuditory sensory discriminationDecision biasSignal detection theory

Identifiers

PMID30229307
OpenAlexW2891997810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.