ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Application of Conjoint Analysis to Improve Reliability of Dietician Consultation in Pediatric Celiac Disease.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCeliac disease (CD) management involves lifelong adherence to a gluten-free diet, making the dietician a key member in CD care. However, our institution lacked a standardized process for dietary consultation in newly diagnosed CD.
methodsTo understand provider CD care preferences, a 2
resultsConjoint analysis identified shorter time to initial follow-up visit and concurrent GI/dietician visits as more important attributes in newly diagnosed CD subjects' care. Types of follow-up provider during first or subsequent visits were identified as less important attributes. After initiation of a standardized follow-up process, a special cause was identified in December 2015 with a decrease in the mean time to dietary consultation from 30 to 20 days. In addition, standardized follow-up resulted in a more reliable process as evident by a special cause on the G-control chart in February 2015.
conclusionConjoint analysis identified attributes thought to be important in CD follow-up care. After redesign of our care process, a decrease in time to dietary consultation with improved reliability was observed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.