ReviewJournal of analytical methods in chemistry2018
New Advances in Toxicological Forensic Analysis Using Mass Spectrometry Techniques.
Review in Journal of analytical methods in chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- High-throughput liquid chromatography-vacuum differential mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry for the analysis of isomeric drugs of abuse in human urine.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Article
- Screening for Forensically Relevant Drugs Using Data-Independent High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.Chemical research in toxicology · 2024Article
- Augmentation of MS/MS Libraries with Spectral Interpolation for Improved Identification.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022Article
- Development of a high-throughput differential mobility separation-tandem mass spectrometry (DMS-MS/MS) method for clinical urine drug testing.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2022Article
- Hyphenated high-resolution mass spectrometry-the "all-in-one" device in analytical toxicology?Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2021Review
- Interpol review of toxicology 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reviews mass spectrometry methods in forensic toxicology for the identification and quantification of drugs of abuse in biological fluids, tissues, and synthetic samples, focusing on the methodologies most commonly used; it also discusses new methodologies in screening and target forensic analyses, as well as the evolution of instrumentation in mass spectrometry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.