Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30228909›Full record

ArticleOpen heart

Incidental abnormal CT scan findings during transcatheter aortic valve implantation assessment: incidence and implications.

Akshay Patel, Kajan Mahendran, Michael Collins, Mahmoud Abdelaziz, Saib Khogali, Heyman Luckraz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Akshay PatelDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
Kajan MahendranDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
Michael CollinsDepartment of Radiology, Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
Mahmoud AbdelazizDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
Saib KhogaliDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
Heyman LuckrazDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Centre, American Hospital Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-1218-1243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective series is to describe the prevalence and clinical significance of the incidental findings found during pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) work-up and to ascertain the clinical course of such patients. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing TAVI from 2013 to 2015 where a TAVI CT assessment was performed (n=138) were included in the study. All incidental findings that were not expected from the patient's history were discussed at the TAVI multidisciplinary meeting in order to ascertain the clinical significance of said findings and whether they would alter the proposed course of treatment. Mortality data were determined by careful retrospective case note and follow-up appointment analysis. Results: Seventy-eight patients (57%) were found to have incidental findings on pre-TAVI CT scan. The majority of patients had benign pathology with high incidence in particular of diverticular disease, pleural effusions, gallstones, hiatus hernia and degenerative spinal disease. Vascular pathology such as superior mesenteric, renal and iliac artery stenoses and abdominal aortic aneurysm was detected in seven patients. In terms of long-term mortality data, we found no significant difference between those with incidental findings and those without (p=0.48). Survival as assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference between those with and without incidental abnormal CT scan findings (p=0.98). Conclusions: Incidental findings with potential for malignancy are common in an elderly, comorbid population. Ultimately, clinical correlation and prognosis must be swiftly ascertained in order to streamline the patients down the appropriate management pathway while avoiding unnecessary delay for treatment of their aortic stenosis.

Indexed as

aortic valve replacement (AVR)computed tomography (CT)trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Identifiers

PMID30228909
PMCPMC6135460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.