Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30228885›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2018

High-resolution manometry is superior to endoscopy and radiology in assessing and grading sliding hiatal hernia: A comparison with surgical in vivo evaluation.

Salvatore Tolone, Edoardo Savarino, Giovanni Zaninotto, C Prakash Gyawali, Marzio Frazzoni, Nicola de Bortoli, Leonardo Frazzoni, Gianmattia Del Genio, Giorgia Bodini, Manuele Furnari and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Salvatore ToloneDepartment of Surgery, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1653-9903
Edoardo SavarinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giovanni ZaninottoDepartment of Surgery, Imperial College, London, UK.
C Prakash GyawaliDepartment of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3388-0660
Marzio FrazzoniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy.
Nicola de BortoliDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Leonardo FrazzoniDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Gianmattia Del GenioDepartment of Surgery, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy.
Giorgia BodiniDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Manuele FurnariDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Vincenzo SavarinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Ludovico DocimoDepartment of Surgery, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITNational Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment · USNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHiatal hernia is diagnosed by barium-swallow esophagogram or esophagogastroduodenoscopy, with possible suboptimal results. High-resolution manometry clearly identifies crural diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter.

objectivesTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution manometry in detecting hiatal hernia compared to esophagogram and esophagogastroduodenoscopy, using as reference the surgical in vivo measurement.

methodsPatients were studied with esophagogram, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, high-resolution manometry and in vivo evaluation of the esophago-gastric junction. Esophago-gastric junction was classified as type I (no separation between crural diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter); type II (≥1, ≤ 2 cm separation); type III (>2 cm). During in vivo measurement, distance between the esophago-gastric junction and crural diaphragm proximal border was recorded.

resultsSurgery identified 53 hiatal hernias in 100 patients. Forty-seven percent were classified as type I esophago-gastric junction, 35% type II and 18% type III. Referenced to in vivo evaluation, high-resolution manometry showed superior diagnostic sensitivity and specificity (94.3% and 91.5%, respectively) to esophagogram and esophagogastroduodenoscopy, with 92.6% predictive value of a positive test and 93.5% predictive value of a negative test. The kappa value for high-resolution manometry and in vivo evaluation was 0.85. High-resolution manometry showed optimal sensitivity and specificity in detecting types I, II and III esophago-gastric junction.

conclusionsHigh-resolution manometry enables an accurate diagnosis of hiatal hernia and a better classification than endoscopy and radiology, reaching optimal agreement with in vivo assessment.

Indexed as

barium esophagogramesophagogastric junctionHiatal herniahigh resolution manometryupper endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID30228885
PMCPMC6137592
OpenAlexW2800764028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.