Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30228883›Full record

ReviewUnited European gastroenterology journal2018

Use of checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients.

Stefan Munker, Enrico N De Toni

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in United European gastroenterology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Chinese expert consensus on the use of standardized second-line drugs for primary hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan MunkerDepartment of Medicine II, Hospital of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Enrico N De ToniDepartment of Medicine II, Hospital of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
München Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of their major impact in cancer therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors are considered to be contraindicated in liver transplant recipients due to fear of rejection and fatal liver failure. Nevertheless, an increasing number of instances of liver transplant recipients treated with checkpoint inhibitors is being published. We reviewed the reports on 14 known cases of liver transplant recipients who underwent treatment with checkpoint inhibitors and discuss factors likely to determine susceptibility to organ rejection including the choice of the agent and the immunosuppression employed, the assessment of Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) status in liver graft biopsies, and the time of treatment initiation.

Indexed as

Checkpoint inhibitionhepatocellular carcinomaliver transplantationliver transplant recipientsnivolumabpembrolizumabrejection

Identifiers

PMID30228883
PMCPMC6137599
OpenAlexW2799746932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.